We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
blow it up
Comments
-
try looking up "genuine fractals" for blowing up images.Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam0
-
Red_Rose_Exile wrote: »You could always try the rasterbator
wow this websites great. i wouldnt like it for this beause of the obviously lines when u put the A4 sheets togther but it will come i really handy on another prject im doing at college.The Optimist and the Pessimist
The difference is a droll
The Optimist sees the doughnut 
:mad: But the Pessimist see the hole :mad:0 -
A bribe to the salesman or evaluation scan at PCWorld etc. might be your answer.
i used to wrk in comet so im gonna take a trip down there after work this week n see if i can get one of the guys to test one of the higher quality scanners.
this is turning into quite an exciting little adventure!!!The Optimist and the Pessimist
The difference is a droll
The Optimist sees the doughnut 
:mad: But the Pessimist see the hole :mad:0 -
I've been scanning old photo's using a 6400 dpi x 9600 dpi , when you blow up the size of the picture you see EVERY bit of dust and imperfectionEx forum ambassador
Long term forum member0 -
I would attack this using a two stage process.
One:
Get the photo professionally restored. There are companies/photogaphers who will (for a price) restore and copy old photos. The contrast can be improved and imperfections touched up. You will then have the original photo and a decent copy.
Two:
I would then have a look at getting the restored photo scanned and blown up. The imperfections will get bigger as you increase the size of the photo but take heart. Many older studio photos will have been taken with a medium format negative. This would be 60*60mm or so. As opposed to 35*24mm for your 35mm print.
Your photo may have more detail in it than many 35mm original negatives would have and their prints. It depends on the original studio's skill. 35mm get shaky when you enlarge then too much e.g. past 10" by 8".
As post above says try A3. You could try a portion of the final print as A3 to get an idea od what the final thing would look like.0 -
It doesn't have to be a high tech option. Just because we can, doesn't mean we have to!
Before the advent of scanners I used to do this with a 35mm SLR camera, a decent set of lenses and a tripod.
Obviously it will pick up all the defects, but if you take it to your local photographers they all use high definition digital cameras these days which can then be manipulated to take out the scratches.
And it won't cost a fortune.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
