PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING
Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.We're aware that dates on the forum are not currently showing correctly, and that mobile users may see some extra spacing between threads. Please bear with us while we get this fixed.
We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum. This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are - or become - political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that dates on the Forum are not currently showing correctly, and that mobile users may see some extra spacing between threads. Please bear with us while we get this fixed, and see Site Feedback for updates.
Using Deed of Trust to save tax

magn8p
Posts: 263 Forumite

I have a rental property and I am currently the only registered owner of the property.
As you know the government is reducing the mortgage interest relief and soon it would be 0%. I am a 40% tax payer, so it's going to get really expensive.
A BTL mortgage broker recently suggested that I add my wife's (who is in 20% band ) to the "Deed of Trust" as higher rental beneficiary (something like 90%) - despite not being a registered owner. I cross checked with other sources like http://www.philmartin.co.uk/deed-of-trust.html and this seems to be a legal way to reduce the tax burden on the rental property.
Now, my question for you is - can I add anyone other than my wife instead - perhaps my father or daughter who currently don't have any income - and effectively making the rental income fall with in their personal allowance, thus considerably reducing the tax on the income form the rental property.
Thanks for your time.
As you know the government is reducing the mortgage interest relief and soon it would be 0%. I am a 40% tax payer, so it's going to get really expensive.
A BTL mortgage broker recently suggested that I add my wife's (who is in 20% band ) to the "Deed of Trust" as higher rental beneficiary (something like 90%) - despite not being a registered owner. I cross checked with other sources like http://www.philmartin.co.uk/deed-of-trust.html and this seems to be a legal way to reduce the tax burden on the rental property.
Now, my question for you is - can I add anyone other than my wife instead - perhaps my father or daughter who currently don't have any income - and effectively making the rental income fall with in their personal allowance, thus considerably reducing the tax on the income form the rental property.
Thanks for your time.
0
Comments
-
Who would receive the income from the property?0
-
It would of course go as per the deed.
If I add my wife - she would receive the percentage mentioned in the deed. So is the case if my father or daughter can be added to the deed.
I currently support my father for his monthly expenses and if this can help me save tax, I would help him with the rental income on the property and save tax.middleclassbutpoor wrote: »Who would receive the income from the property?0 -
Go and speak to an accountant then would be my suggestion.
There may be other considerations when doing this if its not to your spouse such as capital gains tax etc.0 -
Does your daughter already own property? If not does she want to lose future first time buyer status?An answer isn't spam just because you don't like it......0
-
That's definitely worth considering. No, she doesn't.
With her name of deed of trust and not Land Registry's title document - I presumed she would still qualify as a FTB in the future - but then I could be wrong.diggingdude wrote: »Does your daughter already own property? If not does she want to lose future first time buyer status?0 -
as that link warns, taxation of property is based on beneficial ownership
BUT BE CAREFUL - you are sole (legal) owner - making your wife a beneficial owner purely for income tax purposes is covered by "settlements legalisation" which deals with artificial income shifting from a higher to a lower rate taxpayer where the reality is that higher rate taxpayer still has "access" to the money since it is his wife who gets it.
I don't care what that website says about you can do it without, it is much safer to also make her a legal co-owner. That way she inherently has an entitlement to the whole property
To split the income with your (legally married, not "partner"!) wife you need to submit a Form 17 to HMRC along with the DoT. In respect of anyone else other than your (legally married) wife, you do not need a Form 17, you "simply" need a DoT
DoT establishes an entitlement to a share of the property for a non spouse outside of settlements legislation, note that very carefully. You cannot split the income without also splitting the entitlement to the capital share of the property when it is sold.
For a spouse, setting them up as a co-owner under a DoT is exempt from Capital Gains Tax
For your father and anyone other than your spouse, it is not. It would be classed as a (part) disposal of CGT purposes and therefore require you to pay CGT on the part you are disposing of, since CGT is based on beneficial ownership.
as advised, pay for professional advice0 -
That's definitely worth considering. No, she doesn't.
With her name of deed of trust and not Land Registry's title document - I presumed she would still qualify as a FTB in the future - but then I could be wrong.0 -
moneysaving expert dot com or tax dodging expert dot com :mad::mad::mad:0
-
I have a rental property and I am currently the only registered owner of the property.
As you know the government is reducing the mortgage interest relief and soon it would be 0%. I am a 40% tax payer, so it's going to get really expensive.
A BTL mortgage broker recently suggested that I add my wife's (who is in 20% band ) to the "Deed of Trust" as higher rental beneficiary (something like 90%) - despite not being a registered owner. I cross checked with other sources like http://www.philmartin.co.uk/deed-of-trust.html and this seems to be a legal way to reduce the tax burden on the rental property.
Now, my question for you is - can I add anyone other than my wife instead - perhaps my father or daughter who currently don't have any income - and effectively making the rental income fall with in their personal allowance, thus considerably reducing the tax on the income form the rental property.
Thanks for your time.
I'm slightly confused why a mortgage broker would tell you this, as far as I'm aware you cannot do this.
Your lender would have to agree, which would mean mortgaging.
Happy to be corrected0 -
Bacon_Sandwich wrote: »moneysaving expert dot com or tax dodging expert dot com :mad::mad::mad:0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 348.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 452.4K Spending & Discounts
- 240.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 617.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 175.6K Life & Family
- 254.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards