PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING

Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.

We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum. This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are - or become - political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Need a bit of advice about tenancy agreements, please.

2»

Comments

  • Comms69
    Comms69 Posts: 14,229 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper
    bris wrote: »
    Your in for the long haul. I have had two abonments, both took around 7 months to resolve.


    The new laws in Scotland make it easier for us and dramatically reduces the time and effort to get abandoned houses back. But England hasn't caught up with us yet so you need to go down the old route that includes a court order.


    I was also under the impression that waiting for the fixed term to end doesn't actually end the tenancy as a periodic tenancy takes place unless the tenant gives notice of their intent to leave, in writing or handing the keys back is intent. I might be wrong about that though.
    If the tenant vacates on or before the fixed term ends; the tenancy ends on the last day of the fixed term.
  • ambc
    ambc Posts: 125 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    Thanks for all the info. Really useful. I've saved GM's info so I can refer back to it. :)

    Just a quick update... today's visit was actually a pre-arranged visit, organised when the agency first got wind that the tenant was having issues with paying rent. I'd forgotten about that. My mistake.

    However, the tenant obviously wasn't there today when the agent visited, and they're not 100% sure whether he's still living there or not. The agent has left a note asking the tenant to contact them.

    So, that's as much as we know. I guess we'll just need to see what happens over the course of the next week or two.

    I do trust the agent - but I also like to have some understanding of the law/processes, etc.

    Thanks again.
  • G_M
    G_M Posts: 51,977 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    ambc wrote: »
    ...... today's visit was actually a pre-arranged visit, .....Good. Make sure the agency knows/agrees that any future visits must also be pre-arranged. It is YOU who gets the blame if they mess up....

    However, the tenant obviously wasn't there today when the agent visited, and they're not 100% sure whether he's still living there or not. Not good enough. Ask them to state whether the tenant has or has not left possessions in the property. Is it
    a) abandoned with nothing but your inventory items present?
    b) apparantly abandoned but with miscelaneous cheap possessions of the tenants left?
    c) still occupied ie with clothing, furniture, TV etc of the tenants still present


    The agent has left a note asking the tenant to contact them. Good
    As Sajaan said above, either you

    1) get written agreement from the tenant of an Early Surrender. Quickest/cheapest/easiest option
    2) wait till the fixed term ends AND the tenant has clearly left
    3) use a S8 ground 8 when 2 rent payments are outstanding and geta court order
    4) use a S21 served 2+ months before the fixed term ends, then wait for FT expiry and go to court for possession.
  • Mr.Generous
    Mr.Generous Posts: 3,878 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Some tenancy agreements have a clause along the lines of … If the property is left empty for 28 days or more without prior agreement it will be deemed that the tenancy has been given up and the landlord can re take possession … or something like that. Check if you have any clause like that, I certainly wouldn't rely on the agent knowing.
    Mr Generous - Landlord for more than 10 years. Generous? - Possibly but sarcastic more likely.
  • G_M
    G_M Posts: 51,977 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Some tenancy agreements have a clause along the lines of … If the property is left empty for 28 days or more without prior agreement it will be deemed that the tenancy has been given up and the landlord can re take possession … or something like that. Check if you have any clause like that, I certainly wouldn't rely on the agent knowing.
    I've never come across that, but I'd be surprised if that clause would stand up if tested in court.


    Such a clause would be subordinate to the primary term of the contract - the 12 months fixed term.
  • Comms69
    Comms69 Posts: 14,229 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper
    Some tenancy agreements have a clause along the lines of … If the property is left empty for 28 days or more without prior agreement it will be deemed that the tenancy has been given up and the landlord can re take possession … or something like that. Check if you have any clause like that, I certainly wouldn't rely on the agent knowing.

    Can’t see it being lawful.

    Certainly wouldn’t risk it
  • Some tenancy agreements have a clause along the lines of … If the property is left empty for 28 days or more without prior agreement it will be deemed that the tenancy has been given up and the landlord can re take possession … or something like that. Check if you have any clause like that, I certainly wouldn't rely on the agent knowing.

    I've never seen that clause in a tenancy agreement,however for insurance purposes some insurers suggest that if the property is unoccupied for a set period of time without prior knowledge/consent from the LL it may invalidate the landlords property ionsurance policy.

    Thats not to be confused with the tenancy agreement which is a totally separate thing.
    in S 38 T 2 F 50
    out S 36 T 9 F 24 FF 4

    2017-32 2018 -33 2019 -21 2020 -5 2021 -4 2022
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 349K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 452.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 241.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 618.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.1K Life & Family
  • 254.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.