We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Is it too late to ignore my fine after losing the IAS appeal process?

Hi everyone. OK, so I should have read the sticky newbies thread before starting my appeals process as mistakes were made, but I'm wondering if the community thinks I should pay the £100 fine or ride it out? In a nutshell:

I received a notice on my window telling me I hadn't paid for parking at a private car park. I thought I had paid for parking via the 'pay by phone' app but it turns out that I paid for parking for the council-owned car park across the street. In my defence, I don't think it was clear that the two car parks we're separate entities.

I appealed via My Parking Charge which I was advised to do in the letter I received through the door. It was at this point that I admitted I was the driver (another mistake, I know!). I explained that I thought I had paid for correct parking because there was a dodgy sign stuck on the private payment metre that stated: "tickets could be purchased at either machine" with an arrow pointing in the direction of the council-owned car park.

This appeal was rejected, basically saying tough luck - you should have paid and displayed using the correct machine.

I then appealed via the IAS, but this was also rejected and I have been informed to pay the £100 fine for what was a 40-minute stay. Obviously, I don't think this is fair but I fear that if they were to take me to court I could end up paying fee's and ending up paying out way more than £100. I have photo's of the offending signs and all transcriptions of the appeal if anybody wants to know more.

Thank you. How should I proceed?
«134

Comments

  • What parking company?
  • DoaM
    DoaM Posts: 11,863 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    Ignore everything except a real Letter Before Claim (will probably come from Gladstones with a 1xxx reference) or an actual court claim.

    Certainly don't pay!
  • The company is the Vehicle Control Services - they're IPC accredited. If it gets to the point where (or if) I get a letter with a reference, should I pay it then? My concern is if they pursue it and decide to take me to court - I'd have little defence after losing the IAS appeal.

    Thanks for your help guys
  • beamerguy
    beamerguy Posts: 17,587 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    ianjfergie wrote: »
    The company is the Vehicle Control Services - they're IPC accredited. If it gets to the point where (or if) I get a letter with a reference, should I pay it then? My concern is if they pursue it and decide to take me to court - I'd have little defence after losing the IAS appeal.

    Thanks for your help guys

    VCS will use the incredibly useless BWLegal

    Forget "IPC accredited" ... The IPC is simply a scam
    VCS and sister company Excel subscribe to the scam

    But, do read up on BWLegal, you will see all about them.
    For other VCS and BWLegal losses, check out the search
    on the Parking Pranksters Blog

    Here is one
    Excel / BW Legal Incompetence Hits New Low
    http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2016/12/excel-bw-legal-incompetence-hits-new-low.html
  • Coupon-mad
    Coupon-mad Posts: 162,304 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    My concern is if they pursue it and decide to take me to court - I'd have little defence after losing the IAS appeal.

    Why do you think we tell people NEVER to try IAS?!

    Because everyone loses, it is considered biased and worse, it makes you feel on the back foot, when in fact OF COURSE you have a defence, everyone does, and we almost always win in a well-defended case, regardless of a lost POPLA or IAS 'decision'.

    By doing IAS you've upset yourself and made yourself feel like you have no chance. WRONG.
    PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
    CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
    Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD
  • I really wished I'd read the newbies guide before I started the process, it has been an onslaught on the senses - a very cleverly worded template system to make you feel incompetent. To the point where I think; F' it, I'll just pay. I probably would have paid if it was a £30 charge, but £100 is pure greed.

    The Parking Pranksters site is quite amusing and reassuring. I want to fight the charge on principle but there's still that niggling at the back of my mind that want's to get rid of the hassle and threat of court dates, taking time off work etc. I'll wait until I get the letter and keep you updated :)
  • beamerguy
    beamerguy Posts: 17,587 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 19 September 2017 at 5:54PM
    ianjfergie wrote: »
    I really wished I'd read the newbies guide before I started the process, it has been an onslaught on the senses - a very cleverly worded template system to make you feel incompetent. To the point where I think; F' it, I'll just pay. I probably would have paid if it was a £30 charge, but £100 is pure greed.

    The Parking Pranksters site is quite amusing and reassuring. I want to fight the charge on principle but there's still that niggling at the back of my mind that want's to get rid of the hassle and threat of court dates, taking time off work etc. I'll wait until I get the letter and keep you updated :)

    No point in the past

    You have used the magic word incompetent :)

    BWLegal are incompetent, proven time and again

    If you found the Pranksters site amusing then have a read
    of this thread which highlights the ultimate incompetence
    of this bunch ...and when you win, your success will be added
    https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5672664

    The known path that BWLegal follow is

    1: Threatening letters about what they are going to do to you.
    Fabrication of past cases where they are so mis-guided
    2: Once they understand that you will defend and know
    you are serious, they try a special offer and then shortly
    after, they discontinue.
    Does not happen all the time but then they run the gauntlet
    of being whooped in court

    A leopard does not change it's spots and this is akin to
    the boring repeats on BBC TV
  • Snakes_Belly
    Snakes_Belly Posts: 3,725 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 19 September 2017 at 6:22PM
    Ian,

    If its any consolation I did exactly the same as you. I did not even wait for the letter but logged in after I found a notice on my car. Appealed to Excel which was refused and went through the bruising exercise of appealing to IAS. As someone whose last ticket was over 20 years ago when I was a carer I find this all now a bit of a minefield (That ticket was cancelled btw.) I have to decide now whether to put up or shut up. I did take a look at the amount that the directors of Excel took in dividends last year (not salary) and I am angry.

    Whatever I decide to do and even if I pay up I shall use every opportunity I get to take a shot at these legalised scammers. I shall write to my MP and encourage my relatives and friends to do the same.

    Nolite te bast--des carborundorum.
  • Ralph-y
    Ralph-y Posts: 4,820 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 19 September 2017 at 6:54PM
    Snakes Belly , you will need to start a new thread to get the help to overturn this ...

    Do Not Think Of Paying!

    mean time

    try your MP

    this is a copy of a post by Bargepole ....

    "Some action at last:

    http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2017-19/parkingcodeofpractice.html

    This Private Member's Bill has Government and cross-party support, and stands a good chance of making it into statute.

    The full text of the clauses will be published nearer the date of the second reading, but my sources tell me it's something we should support.

    Now would be a good time to write to your MP urging them to support it."

    let here know that there have been many complaints about this car park scam

    he/ she may well help intervene

    good luck

    Ralph:cool:
  • Snakes_Belly
    Snakes_Belly Posts: 3,725 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 19 September 2017 at 6:55PM
    Thank you Ralph. I already have a thread but I felt for Ian as the IAS rejections are quite bruising. You wonder if they have read your side of the case.

    As a matter of interest some of my family know the chief whip.

    Nolite te bast--des carborundorum.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.6K Life & Family
  • 261.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.