We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Letting out a property expenses
PCharlie
Posts: 3 Newbie
in Cutting tax
I am thinking of doing a BTL and have think I understand what you can or can't being the biggest of what you can claim as expenses on mortgage interest. If I however don't have a mortgage on that property but another can I put It down as cash as an expense! for the purchase price. This just sounds ridiculous even typing it but isn't the purchase the biggest expense! as surely no one would ever make a profit.
0
Comments
-
It is a bit ridiculous. You have purchased a property for, say, £150000. You let it out, receive an income less expenses and at the end of the year the property is still worth £150000. Where is the expense incurred?0
-
You can't claim the cost of the property nor doing it up for rent, against the rental income. You claim those costs against the eventual selling price - i.e. capital gains tax on sale price less purchase price.0
-
Thank you for clarifying. Think I was reading too much and getting way too confused!!0
-
IANAE but I think the answer to your Q is, yes you can (claim tax relief on interest payments)- if you can argue that the mortgage on property A (eg, the house you live in) raised the money for property B, the property you let.0
-
I am thinking of doing a BTL and have think I understand what you can or can't being the biggest of what you can claim as expenses on mortgage interest. If I however don't have a mortgage on that property but another can I put It down as cash as an expense! for the purchase price. This just sounds ridiculous even typing it but isn't the purchase the biggest expense! as surely no one would ever make a profit.
It is the purpose of the money that counts. So if you borrow against your residnetial home to buy the BTL, the interest on that money would be an expense (but not capital repayment and note the rules introduced in limiting what is allowable for higher rate tax payers).
Easy evidence will be in the timing - if you borrowed money aligning with the purchase time. I reckon you would have a harder job justifying an existing mortgage; even arguing that you could have paid off that mortgage but chose to keep it to fund the BTL is harder to prove.I'm a Forum Ambassador on the housing, mortgages & student money saving boards. I volunteer to help get your forum questions answered and keep the forum running smoothly. Forum Ambassadors are not moderators and don't read every post. If you spot an illegal or inappropriate post then please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com (it's not part of my role to deal with this). Any views are mine and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.com.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.2K Life & Family
- 260.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
