We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Charge on house we bought

2»

Comments

  • Marktheshark
    Marktheshark Posts: 5,841 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    I stated on a similar post that undertakings are not worth the paper and was berated by dozens, this proves why.
    Indemnity policy is the better option.

    As for this, start the solicitors complaints procedure before the statute of limitations gets them off the hook.
    I do Contracts, all day every day.
  • silvercar
    silvercar Posts: 50,887 Ambassador
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Academoney Grad Name Dropper
    marksoton wrote: »
    The veracity of your seller can't really be questioned now but that of your solicitor can and should be.

    I wouldn't be happy.

    Not sure I would be totally happy with the seller. Did they ask welcome finance to send them details of the loan extension to their new address, or did they rely on mail forwarding. At some point they would have to sign to accept the money and no doubt there would be something in the paperwork that says that "your home is at risk if you don't keep up repayments..." So did they think the loan was secured on their new home, assuming they bought again? Or did they know that the lender was using the original security for the loan?

    May be worth a call/ letter to welcome finance.
    I'm a Forum Ambassador on the housing, mortgages & student money saving boards. I volunteer to help get your forum questions answered and keep the forum running smoothly. Forum Ambassadors are not moderators and don't read every post. If you spot an illegal or inappropriate post then please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com (it's not part of my role to deal with this). Any views are mine and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.com.
  • marksoton
    marksoton Posts: 17,516 Forumite
    silvercar wrote: »
    Not sure I would be totally happy with the seller. Did they ask welcome finance to send them details of the loan extension to their new address, or did they rely on mail forwarding. At some point they would have to sign to accept the money and no doubt there would be something in the paperwork that says that "your home is at risk if you don't keep up repayments..." So did they think the loan was secured on their new home, assuming they bought again? Or did they know that the lender was using the original security for the loan?

    May be worth a call/ letter to welcome finance.

    Oh i'd be mad as hell don't get me wrong. My point was i can't see how the OP would have any recourse from them that's all.
  • davidmcn
    davidmcn Posts: 23,596 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I stated on a similar post that undertakings are not worth the paper and was berated by dozens, this proves why.
    Indemnity policy is the better option.

    An indemnity policy which protects you against your seller not bothering to redeem their secured lending? Does that even exist as a product? And how would it help in this situation - the new lender is still going to insist on the prior charge being removed.

    A solicitors undertaking can be enforced against the solicitors, and they have insurance to back it up.
  • chrissie83
    chrissie83 Posts: 90 Forumite
    Good news the charge has been removed! Phew I'm relieved, we can continue with the remortgage.
    I think I'm going to still speak to the purchasing solicitor though, I don't want anything from them or anything but they have made a mistake which has taken me 3 weeks to sort out & loads of chasing about (& a hefty phone bill) & I have had to sort it myself which ( I think) should have all been dealt with when the purchase was going through.
  • chrissie83
    chrissie83 Posts: 90 Forumite
    & thank you all for the help :)
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.5K Life & Family
  • 261.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.