PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING
Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum. This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are - or become - political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
sell house to BTL buyer and rent back?

staffie1
Posts: 1,967 Forumite


Have sold my house STC to a buyer who wants it as a buy-to-let. However, my house purchase will probably not proceed now. If I exchanged contracts with my buyer and sold my house and remained in it until I find another property in the new year (if buyer agrees), are there any obvious pitfalls with this? It will cost me more in rent each month than my current mortgage, but the current market rate would be affordable.
It took nearly 6 mths for me to find a serious buyer, and I don't want to go through that process again.
Any thoughts?
It took nearly 6 mths for me to find a serious buyer, and I don't want to go through that process again.
Any thoughts?
If you will the end, you must will the means.
0
Comments
-
There's not really any pitfalls for you. I would think that renting rather than remaining in a chain would be make you a more attractive buyer when you do find somewhere.
It's mostly your buyer that will be taking a risk as they don't know what sort of tenant you'll be. Then again they won't have any void period when they first take over ownership of the property.0 -
All seems legal and above board.
But how will you feel about being in 'your' house when it's really not? For example, 24 hours notice for inspection visits, knowing that damage will come off your deposit etc.
NB BTL biuyers will gazunder you at the drop of a hat0 -
You will have to give notice when you leave, or risk breaking the contract, depending on how it is worded.I am a LandLord,(under review) so there!:p0
-
Just make sure you get a proper tenancy agreement in place that protects you. Don't assume anything on good faithChanging the world, one sarcastic comment at a time.0
-
I_have_spoken wrote: »
NB BTL biuyers will gazunder you at the drop of a hat
True I guess, but then if it came to that, i can forget the whole thing and put the house back on the market in the new year. Don't really want to go through all that again, but better than giving in to tactics such as that.If you will the end, you must will the means.0 -
In this situation, would that be done via a solicitor?
No, the buyer (your LL) would just provide you with a tenancy agreement. If the LL doesn't provide you with a tenancy agreement there would still be a valid tenancy in place as soon as you paid money in exchange for living in the property. You'd have a Contractual Periodic Tenancy.0 -
If the buyer needs a mortgage, you will probably find the lender wouldn't be happy with such an arrangement.
I don't see how the purchaser's solicitor could certify obtaining vacant possession to the lender.I am a mortgage broker. You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice. Please do not send PMs asking for one-to-one-advice, or representation.0 -
kingstreet wrote: »If the buyer needs a mortgage, you will probably find the lender wouldn't be happy with such an arrangement.
I don't see how the purchaser's solicitor could certify obtaining vacant possession to the lender.
Does that go even for BTL mortgages which the buyer is applying for?
Edit: Actually do we know if the buyer needs a mortgage?0 -
That would then be a sale-and-lease-back deal.
If so it is possible (& new owner likely doesn;t realise..) that the tenancy must be for at least 5 years: Tenant gets 14 day cooling-off time after signing:You need some sort of licence, from the (now new name) FCA..
see
http://www.theguardian.com/money/201...back-shut-down
- and other conditions....
&
http://www.adviceguide.org.uk/englan...ck_schemes.htm0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 348.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 452.3K Spending & Discounts
- 240.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 617K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 175.6K Life & Family
- 253.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards