We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum. This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are - or become - political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
claiming royalty gold fees
centurion_36
Posts: 47 Forumite
I was cold called by a company called Emcas who tried to get me to claim back my PPIs and endowment fees which i had already claimed back. They told me i could claim back bank fees from my rbs royaltys gold account. I didnt know i could so i let them go ahead and try for me. I did not know i could claim it myself and did not really have the time. I have since had two letter from RBS that i have had to reply to and it seems like i am doing all the work. The latest letter is asking me about a previous Historic Nat west account(pre 2000) to see if i had paid any account fees for that account so when and if i get my fees back i will have to pay emcas 35% for just an initial letter from them
0
Comments
-
If you signed their contract, then yes you'll have to pay them.0
-
centurion_36 wrote: »Emcas who tried to get me to claim back my PPIs and endowment fees which i had already claimed backcenturion_36 wrote: »I did not know i could claim it myselfcenturion_36 wrote: »it seems like i am doing all the work.centurion_36 wrote: »when and if i get my fees back i will have to pay emcas 35% for just an initial letter from them0
-
Depending on how much you think you can get from the charges, may be worth looking into cancelling with EMCAS - check the contract or ring them up to see what they will charge for the "work" they have done so far - if it's a lot less than you are going to get from the bank (assuming you have a solid case) then pay it up - better that than 40% of any winnings.
In any case, getting rid of them will stop them charging you for any future claims you may make which their contract will probably say they can doSam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness:
People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.
0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 347.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 251.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 452.2K Spending & Discounts
- 240.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 616.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 175.4K Life & Family
- 253.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards