We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Council Bribes & Green rules add tens of thousands to new house costs.

2»

Comments

  • Generali
    Generali Posts: 36,411 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/to-have-a-broom-cupboard-of-ones-own-why-solving-the-housing-crisis-is-not-an-impossible-dream-8448613.html

    Interesting stuff.

    So a bog standard 4 bed Barratt rabbit hutch costs 76K to build, PLUS up to 40K in council bribes, PLUS an additional 38K in green regulation costs by 2016, PLUS the land, PLUS builders profits.

    It's a miracle they're still on sale in some parts of the country for under 200K... But I guarantee they won't be by 2016.

    I can foresee a boom in older house prices as people are priced out of new builds in the near future.

    It's ludicrous. Why not simply let builders build houses that people want to live in? The 3 bed semi, the cornerstone of the UK's urban housing market in the SE at least, was and remains popular because builders could supply what people not councils demanded.

    As to the economic impact of this, it will mean that new houses depreciate in value more quickly as there is a lot more of the price that isn't buying you any land and it's the land that appreciates in value. Also it presumably means that the price of second hand properties rises as they become relatively more attractive.

    It also pushes up the risks for banks lending high LTVs on new build. That probably closes off new build for FTBs.
  • michaels
    michaels Posts: 29,425 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Surely a lot depends on the future path of energy prices - if they do increase sharply every year then a low energy footprint could become valuable. Suppose averag3e energy bill is 4k then living in a house that only costs 2k leaves a big saving to cover a higher purchase price.
    I think....
  • Perhaps this goes some way to explaining the issues I had in another thread. As I said new houses are now so small the Mrs and I consider them impractical to live in. As for the prices, £200k seems very optimistic to me - its more like a minimum of £260k round here. That's £260k for a house that can't be lived in - not a transaction I am willing to enter and I have no idea why other people do either.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.9K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 602.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.9K Life & Family
  • 260.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.