We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum. This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are - or become - political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Inheritance from divorced parents

My mother and father had divorced a couple of years ago, they agreed that mother could keep the property where I live at and proceeded with the divorce, however I am not sure if the deed of the property changed. After my mother had passed away I checked the land register for the property it shows that both my mother and father are registered owners. Does this mean that my father is now the only owner of the property? Do me and my sibling inherit the property? There were no wills left. Could anybody clarify this situation?

Thanks.
«1

Comments

  • RAS
    RAS Posts: 33,976 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Hi

    I think you need to know if it was a joint tenancy.

    There are rules re inheritance of property if someone dies intestate but check that first.
    The person who has not made a mistake, has made nothing
  • RAS wrote: »
    Hi

    I think you need to know if it was a joint tenancy.

    There are rules re inheritance of property if someone dies intestate but check that first.

    Yes I am pretty sure it is joint tenancy. But shouldn't the property now be fully registered to my mother after the divorce? If not, now that my mother has passed away and my father is no longer the partner of my mother, surely the 50% that was registered to my mother would now be left equally to the two children she has?
  • RAS
    RAS Posts: 33,976 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Joint tenancy does not work like that, the whole property belongs jointly to both people. No need even for probate.

    I am astounded this was not sorted out when they divorced. Normally after divorce the ex partner cannot inherit but joint tenancy is not an inheritance. Anyone got a copy ofthe divorce settlement
    The person who has not made a mistake, has made nothing
  • MrsTinks
    MrsTinks Posts: 15,241 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker Name Dropper
    If she died interstate (no will) and your parents are still jointly listed as owners of the property then I think your father now owns the house... I would really recommend you get some professional legal help on this one as it would seem to me that they may need to check the actual divorce agreement as well as the landregistry files etc... Most solicitors do a free 30 minute initial consultation and should be able to tell you where you stand...
    DFW Nerd #025
    DFW no more! Officially debt free 2017 - now joining the MFW's! :)

    My DFW Diary - blah- mildly funny stuff about my journey
  • Well in the land registry it just says
    Registered Owners: Father and Mother of Address.

    Under the proprietorship clause [when they bought it] it also says Father and Mother as the proprietors.

    Neither me nor my sister are bothered about the actual inheritance as we will still all be living there together, we're just wondering what the legal stance is.
  • MrsTinks
    MrsTinks Posts: 15,241 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker Name Dropper
    Legally I think your dad owns it... but you need someone to look at the divorce agreement really... it MIGHT override the usual rules which is that your dad would as far as I know own it if they are jointly named.
    The other problem ofcourse would be if he had to sell for any reason - you'd have no right to remain there...
    DFW Nerd #025
    DFW no more! Officially debt free 2017 - now joining the MFW's! :)

    My DFW Diary - blah- mildly funny stuff about my journey
  • MrsTine wrote: »
    Legally I think your dad owns it... but you need someone to look at the divorce agreement really... it MIGHT override the usual rules which is that your dad would as far as I know own it if they are jointly named.
    The other problem ofcourse would be if he had to sell for any reason - you'd have no right to remain there...

    If I were to go the court where my parents' divorce was executed would they provide me with their divorce agreement?

    If in the agreement it clearly states as my mother being the only new owner of the property would that override the land registry with regards to inheritance?

    We understand that we would have no right to remain in the event of a sale, but we jointly feel that if that was the decision of our father we accept it, so there are no moral issues with that. However if we are entitled to anything it would be a reassuring bonus.
  • margaretclare
    margaretclare Posts: 10,789 Forumite
    I think it has already been said, but - a property in joint names is owned by both 'jointly and severally' i.e. they both own it, not half each, the whole thing. If one dies the survivor automatically owns the whole property.

    It should have been sorted out at the time of divorce.
    [FONT=Times New Roman, serif]Æ[/FONT]r ic wisdom funde, [FONT=Times New Roman, serif]æ[/FONT]r wear[FONT=Times New Roman, serif]ð[/FONT] ic eald.
    Before I found wisdom, I became old.
  • RAS
    RAS Posts: 33,976 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Hi

    I think you are not quite getting something

    The house is either a joint tenancy or it is tenants in common. In both instances both nmames are listed.

    If it is the former then the whole house transfer to dad, unless there was something in the divorce settlement.

    If it is tenants in common, then mum's half will be distributed according to the intestacy regulations.
    The person who has not made a mistake, has made nothing
  • Debt_Free_Chick
    Debt_Free_Chick Posts: 13,276 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    I think you need to go back to the divorce and be clear about what happened with the property. It could be that it should have been transferred to your mum, as the settlement. But it's also very common for "nothing" to happen to the property, but for mum to be allowed to continue to occupy the property, until all kids have completed full time education. The property remains jointly owned (or ex-husband takes a charge over it) until that time, when the intention is for it to be sold and the proceeds split between them.

    However, if this were the case, I would expect it to have been held as tenants in common, rather than jointly.

    Worth checking out what was supposed to have happened.
    Warning ..... I'm a peri-menopausal axe-wielding maniac ;)
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 347.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 251.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 451.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 239.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 615.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 175.1K Life & Family
  • 252.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.