Your browser isn't supported
It looks like you're using an old web browser. To get the most out of the site and to ensure guides display correctly, we suggest upgrading your browser now. Download the latest:

Welcome to the MSE Forums

We're home to a fantastic community of MoneySavers but anyone can post. Please exercise caution & report spam, illegal, offensive or libellous posts/messages: click "report" or email forumteam@.

    • Money...MATTERS
    • By Money...MATTERS 16th Dec 17, 12:13 PM
    • 13Posts
    • 0Thanks
    Excel Parking fines
    • #1
    • 16th Dec 17, 12:13 PM
    Excel Parking fines 16th Dec 17 at 12:13 PM
    There are two car parks on the same site adjacent to each other and with the same name one part of the site is run by Excel/ Vehicle Control Services Ltd the other part by a local authority.

    The issuing authority of the permit advised that they contacted Excel/VCS LTD requesting they change the name as it is misleading and many people have been dealt the same fate, however they have not received a response.

    After two NTK and two rejected initial appeals, another PCN was received for another ticket via ANPR issued 34 days.

    Is 34 days to late to issue via ANPR?

    What is the best way to challenge this fine?
    Last edited by Money...MATTERS; 05-01-2018 at 9:42 PM. Reason: For clarity
Page 2
    • Money...MATTERS
    • By Money...MATTERS 8th Jan 18, 11:30 PM
    • 13 Posts
    • 0 Thanks
    The initial appeal was neither accepted nor rejected by the PPC, instead the Keeper has been given an additional 14 days to try and identify the driver (presumably because the NTK was served late and the keeper alerted the PPC of this) and share their details and as a "goodwill gesture" the PPC has kept the charge at the lowered rate of £60, that is so thoughtful.

    The keeper will endeavour to establish who the driver was but if by day 13 this has not been achieved the keeper will respond to the PPC to inform them as such being that the Keeper is very reasonable.

    If the PPC then wants to pursue the keeper on the assumption that they were the driver (as stated on the NTK) the Keeper will as a goodwill gesture give the PPC an opportunity to respond to the questions posed in the original appeal (IPC template).

    Any thoughts or suggestions of whether to reply or not would be useful. Thank you.
    • KeithP
    • By KeithP 8th Jan 18, 11:48 PM
    • 6,094 Posts
    • 4,987 Thanks
    Any thoughts or suggestions of whether to reply or not would be useful.
    Originally posted by Money...MATTERS
    My thoughts, well only one, don't waste your time replying.
    It will make no difference.
    • Lamilad
    • By Lamilad 9th Jan 18, 3:17 AM
    • 1,315 Posts
    • 2,613 Thanks
    Wait for the letter of claim
Welcome to our new Forum!

Our aim is to save you money quickly and easily. We hope you like it!

Forum Team Contact us

Live Stats

130Posts Today

1,417Users online

Martin's Twitter