Your browser isn't supported
It looks like you're using an old web browser. To get the most out of the site and to ensure guides display correctly, we suggest upgrading your browser now. Download the latest:

Welcome to the MSE Forums

We're home to a fantastic community of MoneySavers but anyone can post. Please exercise caution & report spam, illegal, offensive or libellous posts/messages: click "report" or email forumteam@.

Search
  • FIRST POST
    • bergkamp
    • By bergkamp 4th Nov 17, 4:11 PM
    • 157Posts
    • 247Thanks
    bergkamp
    UK Car Park Management try very hard to enable Shedule 4.
    • #1
    • 4th Nov 17, 4:11 PM
    UK Car Park Management try very hard to enable Shedule 4. 4th Nov 17 at 4:11 PM
    NTK issued date 12 days after the event, with the sentence;


    ' This notice is deemed to have been given to you on the second working day after the date of sending above',


    added to end of the POFA blurb.


    Obviously this means nothing without proof of postage, and the NTK was actually received by the RK 16 days after the event.


    The relevant land specified is ' ONE STOP '. Very informative!


    The IPC template has been sent with the addition of no keeper liability explanation for them...
Page 2
    • DoaM
    • By DoaM 6th Jan 18, 3:11 PM
    • 3,772 Posts
    • 3,833 Thanks
    DoaM
    Perhaps the OP has removed that file now?
    Diary of a madman
    Walk the line again today
    Entries of confusion
    Dear diary, I'm here to stay
    • bergkamp
    • By bergkamp 6th Jan 18, 3:40 PM
    • 157 Posts
    • 247 Thanks
    bergkamp
    https://www.dropbox.com/s/8lim1ctsavqhx12/FORMAL_DEMAND%20REDACTED.pdf?dl=0


    In response to Formal demand;


    Data Protection Act 1998 – Section 10 Data Subject Notice

    I am the registered keeper of the vehicle with registration mark XXXXXXX and received your Notice To Keeper (PCN) number 9999999.
    You cannot use Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 to transfer liability to the registered keeper, as the NTK does not meet the criteria needed to enable the Act.
    I then received your Formal Demand with the same reference number. This stated that you allegedly have the right to recover from the driver the parking charge amount.
    I am under no obligation to name the driver.
    You have been informed numerous times at the two appeal stages that I was not the driver and will not be naming them.
    As a result, there is no legally-enforceable parking charge against me the registered keeper and no justification for you to pursue me. You must now delete all my personal information that you have obtained and hold . Your unreasonable and unlawful demand for payment is causing me significant distress and anxiety.

    I demand that you immediately cease and desist from processing my personal data, except to inform me that you have complied with this demand. Any further processing of my personal data, including demands for payment or passing my personal data to any third party, will be considered harassment and a flagrant disregard of the DPA, which will be reported to DVLA and to your ATA, and may result in legal action against you for compensation or damages, including Exemplary or Punitive damages.

    The DPA requires you to respond to this notice within 21 days to confirm that you have or will comply with my demands, or to explain why you have not or will not comply.
    Hope link works now!


    https://www.dropbox.com/s/mdzw9kcoau7ueyg/UKCPMSection10DataSubjectNotice.pdf?dl=0
    Last edited by bergkamp; 08-01-2018 at 12:31 PM.
    • Coupon-mad
    • By Coupon-mad 6th Jan 18, 3:45 PM
    • 52,867 Posts
    • 66,381 Thanks
    Coupon-mad
    Looks fine to me, and yep that's a non-POFA NTK, talking only about 'driver' liability.
    PRIVATE PCN? DON'T PAY BUT DO NOT IGNORE IT TWO Clicks needed for advice:
    Top of the page: Home>>Forums>Household & Travel>Motoring>Parking Tickets, Fines & Parking - read the 'NEWBIES' FAQS thread!
    Advice to ignore is WRONG, unless in Scotland/NI.

    • bergkamp
    • By bergkamp 19th Jan 18, 4:40 PM
    • 157 Posts
    • 247 Thanks
    bergkamp
    Received from UKCPM in response to the Section 10 Data Subject Notice;


    https://www.dropbox.com/s/qifw4ihk5gbm5x6/CPM_UK%20RESPONSE.pdf?dl=0


    Will have to wait and see what comes next...
    • Umkomaas
    • By Umkomaas 19th Jan 18, 5:10 PM
    • 16,344 Posts
    • 25,432 Thanks
    Umkomaas
    Actually, the IAS has not decided that ‘you are liable for the parking charge fee’ - that is a gross misrepresentation by UKCPM and should be the subject of a strong complaint to the DVLA!
    We cannot provide you with a silver bullet to get you out of this. You have to be in for the long run, and need to involve yourself in research and work for you to get rid of this. It is not simple. We will help, but can't do it for you.

    Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.
    • beamerguy
    • By beamerguy 19th Jan 18, 6:43 PM
    • 6,735 Posts
    • 8,714 Thanks
    beamerguy
    Received from UKCPM in response to the Section 10 Data Subject Notice;


    https://www.dropbox.com/s/qifw4ihk5gbm5x6/CPM_UK%20RESPONSE.pdf?dl=0


    Will have to wait and see what comes next...
    Originally posted by bergkamp
    I wonder what idiot from UKCPM dreamed
    that load of rubbish up

    Apart from being a complete scam, the IAS
    are pretend ajudicators and CANNOT tell
    anyone to pay ... ONLY A REAL JUDGE CAN

    Imbeciles proving to themselves they are Imbeciles
    YES complain to David Dunford of the DVLA
    and copy in Sir Greg Knight who is heading
    a private members bill regarding the parking
    industry.
    https://www.parliament.uk/biographies/commons/sir-greg-knight/1200

    By now Sir Greg will already know all about the
    Great Gladstones/IPC/IAS and members SCAM

    Maybe the scam boys at the IAS should tell
    UKCPM to STOP TELLING LIES
    Last edited by beamerguy; Yesterday at 6:46 PM.
    RBS - MNBA - CAPITAL ONE - LLOYDS

    DISGUSTING BEHAVIOUR
    • Ryandavis1959
    • By Ryandavis1959 19th Jan 18, 7:27 PM
    • 192 Posts
    • 51 Thanks
    Ryandavis1959
    I wonder what idiot from UKCPM dreamed
    that load of rubbish up

    Apart from being a complete scam, the IAS
    are pretend ajudicators and CANNOT tell
    anyone to pay ... ONLY A REAL JUDGE CAN

    Imbeciles proving to themselves they are Imbeciles
    YES complain to David Dunford of the DVLA
    and copy in Sir Greg Knight who is heading
    a private members bill regarding the parking
    industry.
    https://www.parliament.uk/biographies/commons/sir-greg-knight/1200

    By now Sir Greg will already know all about the
    Great Gladstones/IPC/IAS and members SCAM

    Maybe the scam boys at the IAS should tell
    UKCPM to STOP TELLING LIES
    Originally posted by beamerguy
    Steady on beamerguy ... you forgot to mention reporting them to trading standards as well!
    If you were not the driver write to the parking firm and tell them who was so they CANNOT hold you liable. The person who was driving the car is responsible so let them deal with it. Not you! Donít let people with an agenda tell you otherwise.
Welcome to our new Forum!

Our aim is to save you money quickly and easily. We hope you like it!

Forum Team Contact us

Live Stats

106Posts Today

3,063Users online

Martin's Twitter