Your browser isn't supported
It looks like you're using an old web browser. To get the most out of the site and to ensure guides display correctly, we suggest upgrading your browser now. Download the latest:

Welcome to the MSE Forums

We're home to a fantastic community of MoneySavers but anyone can post. Please exercise caution & report spam, illegal, offensive or libellous posts/messages: click "report" or email forumteam@.

Search
  • FIRST POST
    • elrme
    • By elrme 12th Sep 17, 12:48 AM
    • 4Posts
    • 1Thanks
    elrme
    Directions Questionnaire
    • #1
    • 12th Sep 17, 12:48 AM
    Directions Questionnaire 12th Sep 17 at 12:48 AM
    I have received a Directions questionnaire following submission of my defence....

    Intend to defend via the small claims route.

    Is this the correct initial post to start my own thread?
Page 1
    • Lamilad
    • By Lamilad 12th Sep 17, 1:04 AM
    • 885 Posts
    • 1,857 Thanks
    Lamilad
    • #2
    • 12th Sep 17, 1:04 AM
    • #2
    • 12th Sep 17, 1:04 AM
    If you want it to be.

    Read the NEWBIES thread, post #2 to learn all about the small claims process, including the DQ stage.
    • nosferatu1001
    • By nosferatu1001 12th Sep 17, 10:57 AM
    • 504 Posts
    • 601 Thanks
    nosferatu1001
    • #3
    • 12th Sep 17, 10:57 AM
    • #3
    • 12th Sep 17, 10:57 AM
    Also show us your defence, and maybe a little detail
    But for sure the actual submitted defence.

    The DQ is easy to fill out, and not overall as important as the defence argument already submitted. which you only (formally) get to add to by paying £255, so fingers crossed it was a good one!
    • elrme
    • By elrme 12th Sep 17, 6:26 PM
    • 4 Posts
    • 1 Thanks
    elrme
    • #4
    • 12th Sep 17, 6:26 PM
    • #4
    • 12th Sep 17, 6:26 PM
    I deny that I am liable to the Claimant for the entirety of the claim for each of the following reasons:
    1. The Claim Form issued on the XX XXX 2017 by HX Car Park Management Limited was not correctly filed under The Practice Direction and it is not a valid statement of truth.
    2. This Claimant has not complied with pre-court protocol. And as an example as to why this prevents a full defence being filed at this time, a parking charge can be for trespass, breach of contract or a contractual charge. All these are treated differently in law and require a different defence. The wording of any contract will naturally be a key element in this matter, and a copy of the alleged contract has never been provided to the Defendant.
    a) There was no compliant ‘Letter before County Court Claim’ under the Practice Direction.
    b) The Claim form Particulars are extremely sparse. The Defendant has no idea what the claim is about - why the charge arose, what the alleged contract was; nothing that could be considered a fair exchange of information. The Claim form Particulars did not contain any evidence of contravention or photographs.
    c) The Defence therefore asks the Court to strike out the claim as having no reasonable prospect of success as currently drafted or alternatively, the Defendant asks that the Claimant is required to file Particulars which comply with Practice Directions and include at least the following information; Whether the matter is being brought for trespass, breach of contract or a contractual charge, and an explanation as to the exact nature of the charge with a copy of any contract it is alleged was in place (e.g. copies of signage). If keeper liability is being claimed, and if so copies of any Notice to Driver / Notice to Keeper. Whether the Claimant is acting as Agent or Principal, together with a list of documents they will rely on in this matter.
    d) Once these Particulars have been filed, the Defendant asks for reasonable time to file another defence.
    3. In the absence of any proof of adequate signage that contractually bound the Defendant then there can have been no contract and the Claimant has no case. a) The Claimant is put to strict proof that at the time of the alleged event they had both advertisement consent and the permission from the site owner to display the signs. b) In the absence of strict proof I submit that the Claimant was committing an offence by displaying their signs and therefore no contract could have been entered into between the driver and the Claimant. c) Inadequate signs incapable of binding the driver.
    4. The Claimant has no evidence to prove that the vehicle was within the car park during the alleged parking time, there is no calibration certificate held or provided by the claimant and the ‘Entrance’ and ‘Exit’ to the car park are not clearly demarcated from other parking areas nor the public highway.
    5. The Claimant has added unrecoverable sums to the original amount Claimed for an alleged parking charge. There is a reasonable belief that subsequent charges have not been incurred and were added to inflate the claim. I deny the Claimant is entitled to any interest whatsoever.

    6. No standing: It is believed that HX Car Park Management Limited do not hold a legitimate contract at this car park. As an agent, the Claimant has no legal right to bring such a claim in their name which should be in the name of the landowner.
    7. No legitimate interest: The Defendant denies any liability whatsoever to the Claimant in any matter. The vague Particulars of Claim disclose no clear cause of action.
    The court is invited to strike out the claim of its own volition as having no merit and no reasonable prospects of success.
    I confirm that the above facts and statements are true to the best of my knowledge and recollection.
    • elrme
    • By elrme 12th Sep 17, 6:29 PM
    • 4 Posts
    • 1 Thanks
    elrme
    • #5
    • 12th Sep 17, 6:29 PM
    • #5
    • 12th Sep 17, 6:29 PM
    Thanks, I used this:

    A1 = NO to mediation (they want the whole amount, you want to pay them nothing, so no scope for mediation. This will not go against you)
    B = fill in all the details, name, address, etc
    C1 = YES to small claims track – this is the limited costs track for claims up to £10,000 in value
    D1 = name of your local County Court – unless you are a Ltd company, the case files will be transferred there
    D2 = NO to expert evidence (this relates to medical negligence cases and suchlike)
    D3 = 1 witness (that’s you) (or more if you are going to get another person to provide a statement)
    D4 = Put down the dates of any pre-booked holidays, NO to interpreter (unless you need one).
    Note: Gladstones are currently including a 'request for special directions' asking the Court to hear the case on the papers only, without an oral hearing. You should oppose this, and include the following text in D1: “The Defendant opposes the Claimant’s request for special directions, and requests that the case be listed for an oral hearing at the defendant’s home court, pursuant to CPR 26.2A(3)”.
    • elrme
    • By elrme 12th Sep 17, 6:34 PM
    • 4 Posts
    • 1 Thanks
    elrme
    • #6
    • 12th Sep 17, 6:34 PM
    • #6
    • 12th Sep 17, 6:34 PM
    The details are:
    I was at work and the claimant has ANPR photo of the car to which I am the RK.
    They obtained my detail from DVLA and have sent a Claim via CCBC.
Welcome to our new Forum!

Our aim is to save you money quickly and easily. We hope you like it!

Forum Team Contact us

Live Stats

1,727Posts Today

6,297Users online

Martin's Twitter
  • RT @thismorning: 'Sometimes the best gift is releasing somebody else from the obligation of having to give to you' says @MartinSLewis. Do y?

  • Shana tova umetuka - a sweet Jewish New Year to all celebrating. I won't be online the rest of t'week, as I take the time to be with family

  • Dear Steve. Please note doing a poll to ask people's opinion does not in itself imply an opinion! https://t.co/UGvWlMURxy

  • Follow Martin