Your browser isn't supported
It looks like you're using an old web browser. To get the most out of the site and to ensure guides display correctly, we suggest upgrading your browser now. Download the latest:

Welcome to the MSE Forums

We're home to a fantastic community of MoneySavers but anyone can post. Please exercise caution & report spam, illegal, offensive or libellous posts/messages: click "report" or email forumteam@. Skimlinks & other affiliated links are turned on

Search
  • FIRST POST
    • AG47
    • By AG47 13th Jul 17, 11:48 AM
    • 540Posts
    • 137Thanks
    AG47
    TV licence ran out, not going to renew
    • #1
    • 13th Jul 17, 11:48 AM
    TV licence ran out, not going to renew 13th Jul 17 at 11:48 AM
    We only watch internet stuff that does NOT require a licence.

    What is the best way to let them know so they stop bugging me, I'm getting some seriously irritating letters.

    How can I stop the harassment?
    Last edited by Cornucopia; 13-07-2017 at 6:17 PM. Reason: Corrected title
    Nothing has been fixed since 2008, it was just pushed into the future
Page 1
    • AG47
    • By AG47 13th Jul 17, 11:49 AM
    • 540 Posts
    • 137 Thanks
    AG47
    • #2
    • 13th Jul 17, 11:49 AM
    • #2
    • 13th Jul 17, 11:49 AM
    I have an Amazon fire stick, and I know you can watch things that require a to licence, but we do not.

    I only watch films and other things that do not require a tv licence.

    How can I tell them, what is the best way and the best wording.

    Are there any sample letters?
    Last edited by AG47; 13-07-2017 at 11:55 AM.
    Nothing has been fixed since 2008, it was just pushed into the future
    • AG47
    • By AG47 13th Jul 17, 11:56 AM
    • 540 Posts
    • 137 Thanks
    AG47
    • #3
    • 13th Jul 17, 11:56 AM
    • #3
    • 13th Jul 17, 11:56 AM
    I actually feel so discussed by the pedophile ring that was covered up for so long in the BBC that I want nothing to do with them,

    I seriously want them to stop bugging me with harassment, as I have informed them already that we do not require a to licence
    Nothing has been fixed since 2008, it was just pushed into the future
    • Buzby
    • By Buzby 13th Jul 17, 12:29 PM
    • 8,049 Posts
    • 2,945 Thanks
    Buzby
    • #4
    • 13th Jul 17, 12:29 PM
    • #4
    • 13th Jul 17, 12:29 PM
    Once they accept your declaration that's the end of the hate mail for 2 years, until it starts again.
    • Marvqn1
    • By Marvqn1 13th Jul 17, 4:13 PM
    • 311 Posts
    • 197 Thanks
    Marvqn1
    • #5
    • 13th Jul 17, 4:13 PM
    • #5
    • 13th Jul 17, 4:13 PM
    I actually feel so discussed by the pedophile ring that was covered up for so long in the BBC that I want nothing to do with them,

    I seriously want them to stop bugging me with harassment, as I have informed them already that we do not require a to licence
    Originally posted by AG47
    If that was really true, don't you think millions of people would be cancelling in their droves?
    • Cornucopia
    • By Cornucopia 13th Jul 17, 6:19 PM
    • 8,797 Posts
    • 8,188 Thanks
    Cornucopia
    • #6
    • 13th Jul 17, 6:19 PM
    • #6
    • 13th Jul 17, 6:19 PM
    If that was really true, don't you think millions of people would be cancelling in their droves?
    Originally posted by Marvqn1
    I finally cancelled my Licence in the wake of the Newsnight scandal over Savile, so yes, people are/were concerned enough to take action.

    At the same time, though, the number of households has increased so the BBC is no worse off - according to its own figures.

    What part of the OP's post(s) is it that you doubt the truth of?

    I seriously want them to stop bugging me with harassment, as I have informed them already that we do not require a to licence
    Originally posted by AG47
    There is no "silver bullet" for TV Licensing. The two most common responses are to completely ignore them or to give their "declaration" of having no TV reception. Both of those are quite effective, depending on what you class as harassment. In the latter case, they say that they may still "call to check", but you can turn them away irrespective of having made their "declaration". (I say "declaration" because it has no legal status - it is purely an administrative step).

    Personally, I have used various legal strategies and found them to be effective, but using them without fully understanding them can be dangerous. Of the possible strategies, the least risky/zero risk ones are (a) to formally complain about TVL's policies to the BBC - this tends to ward them off for at least 2 years, and (b) invoking PACE rights in advance - in my case this led to them unilaterally banning themselves from my address for 2 years (I need to check this, as I think it may soon expire).
    Last edited by Cornucopia; 13-07-2017 at 6:33 PM.
    I'm a Board Guide on the Phones & TV, Techie Stuff, In My Home,
    The Money Savers Arms and Food Shopping boards. I'm a volunteer to help the boards run smoothly, and I can move and merge threads there. Any views are mine and not the official line of moneysavingexpert.com.

    Board guides are not moderators. If you spot an inappropriate or illegal post then please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com
    • AG47
    • By AG47 14th Jul 17, 10:57 AM
    • 540 Posts
    • 137 Thanks
    AG47
    • #7
    • 14th Jul 17, 10:57 AM
    • #7
    • 14th Jul 17, 10:57 AM
    If that was really true, don't you think millions of people would be cancelling in their droves?
    Originally posted by Marvqn1
    So you think it's all lies about the pedos

    You think the courts got it wrong and those in prison are all innocent?

    I have to politely disagree with you on that one
    Nothing has been fixed since 2008, it was just pushed into the future
    • AG47
    • By AG47 14th Jul 17, 11:00 AM
    • 540 Posts
    • 137 Thanks
    AG47
    • #8
    • 14th Jul 17, 11:00 AM
    • #8
    • 14th Jul 17, 11:00 AM
    How can you make that declaration? I have written to them declaring I'm not interested in services that I need a licence for, and I asked them to confirm this declaration but I still get the computer generated letters
    Nothing has been fixed since 2008, it was just pushed into the future
    • Cornucopia
    • By Cornucopia 14th Jul 17, 11:08 AM
    • 8,797 Posts
    • 8,188 Thanks
    Cornucopia
    • #9
    • 14th Jul 17, 11:08 AM
    • #9
    • 14th Jul 17, 11:08 AM
    I think the Public's reaction to the child abuse scandal is complicated, and includes:-

    - An element of "benefit of the doubt" or "suspension of belief" regarding BBC management knowledge and involvement at the time of the offences, and a sense that the problem is solely historic (even though Dame Janet Smith's inquiry said that the present-day BBC could still harbour child abusers). OTOH, there is reassurance from the living offenders being progressively dealt with by the Authorities, so justice in those cases is being done.

    - An element of apathy - not being willing to sacrifice live TV, or even not being willing to find out how to be legally Licence-free. (Just assuming that a TV Licence is to own a TV, when it's actually for TV reception).

    - An element of fear of TV Licensing, whose fake authority seems to be thoroughly a part of the Briitsh psyche.

    - Lack of principles - I don't mean that in a nasty way, but few people seem to be willing/able to take a stand even when they passionately disagree with something.


    Personally, I think catch-up is fantastic, and when I go to friends/family who still watch linear TV, it is a very strange sensation to be limited to what the Broadcasters see fit to schedule at that particular time. I also like that (as a general rule) there are fewer ads on the catch-up services compared to live. Whether that will continue (as viewer numbers increase) remains to be seen.
    Last edited by Cornucopia; 14-07-2017 at 11:15 AM.
    I'm a Board Guide on the Phones & TV, Techie Stuff, In My Home,
    The Money Savers Arms and Food Shopping boards. I'm a volunteer to help the boards run smoothly, and I can move and merge threads there. Any views are mine and not the official line of moneysavingexpert.com.

    Board guides are not moderators. If you spot an inappropriate or illegal post then please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com
    • Xbigman
    • By Xbigman 14th Jul 17, 4:21 PM
    • 2,895 Posts
    • 1,153 Thanks
    Xbigman
    But the illegal activities within the BBC are not sanctioned by the BBC and it was ultimately individuals that committed the offences.

    I was undecided about ditching live TV when my TV licence ended at the end of June but it was the left wing bias of the BBC, the gleeful knifing of Theresa May/commiserating with Labour on election night and the Martin McGuinness Funeral coverage that finally caused me to decide. And those are all sanctioned by the BBC.
    But if I hadn't already been thinking about it the above would not have been enough on its own.

    I already received my licence by email so they already have my email address and name and you don't need to fill out the telephone number field so I made the online declaration. Automated receipt reply within hours and a email the next day that I am on their database as 'no licence required'. All very painless so far. Only time will tell if they really do leave me alone as promised.


    Darren
    Xbigman's guide to a happy life.

    Eat properly
    Sleep properly
    Save some money
    • Cornucopia
    • By Cornucopia 14th Jul 17, 4:51 PM
    • 8,797 Posts
    • 8,188 Thanks
    Cornucopia
    But the illegal activities within the BBC are not sanctioned by the BBC and it was ultimately individuals that committed the offences.
    Originally posted by Xbigman
    I would say it was somewhat more nuanced than that. Yes, I agree that any organisation, especially one of the sheer size of the BBC is likely to have its fair share of criminals of one sort or another.

    However, in the case of the child abusers, the BBC always had a duty of care towards its child guests and audience members, and although attitudes towards sexual abuse of adults have undoubtedly changed over time, I don't think that is true in the case of children. If I/my parents had even suspected Jimmy Savile or Rolf Harris at the time when they were being presented as wholesome family entertainment, we would have been horrified.

    Also, I seem to recall that Nick Pollard (who led the inquiry into the Newsnight handling of the Savile scandal) is on record as saying that the level of cooperation he received from BBC Management was not as good as it should have been. (Which in the usually guarded language of such things is fairly damning).

    In the case of the misdemeanours of TV Licensing, they are a matter in many cases of public record, either because they are documented in videos or because they have been formally reported to the BBC (who have generally done nothing). Unfortunately, their governance model is engineered for broadcasting, not law enforcement so actually getting these things resolved is, in the final analysis, proving extremely difficult. On which basis, I would advise anyone dealing with them to exercise extreme caution (depending on the circumstances).

    Only time will tell if they really do leave me alone as promised.
    Where/when did they promise to leave you alone? AFAICT that's not what they say at all.
    Last edited by Cornucopia; 14-07-2017 at 5:08 PM.
    I'm a Board Guide on the Phones & TV, Techie Stuff, In My Home,
    The Money Savers Arms and Food Shopping boards. I'm a volunteer to help the boards run smoothly, and I can move and merge threads there. Any views are mine and not the official line of moneysavingexpert.com.

    Board guides are not moderators. If you spot an inappropriate or illegal post then please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com
    • Tom99
    • By Tom99 14th Jul 17, 5:09 PM
    • 28 Posts
    • 8 Thanks
    Tom99
    You just advise them online then they will send you a notice saying they will not contact you for two years.
    • Cornucopia
    • By Cornucopia 14th Jul 17, 5:16 PM
    • 8,797 Posts
    • 8,188 Thanks
    Cornucopia
    Unfortunately, that's not what they say. (Whether they actually do what they say is another question entirely).


    TV Licensing reserves the right to visit addresses which have claimed No Licence Needed. This is because, although the majority of No Licence Needed claims received by TV Licensing are genuine, latest figures show that almost one in six such
    by TV Licensing
    After an individual has made a No Licence Needed claim to TV Licensing, written acknowledgement and an explanation of the NLC process will be sent to the individual. The address will be given NLC status, mailings to the address will cease for a specified period of time and the premises will become available for visiting in order to confirm that a licence is not needed.
    TV Licensing will visit a sample of NLC addresses to confirm that a licence is not needed.
    NLC = No Licence Needed "Claim".

    In reality, there is no legal meaning behind these claims/declarations of "no Licence needed" or TVL's demands for or receipt of such a claim. It is simply an administrative activity that individual citizens can choose to participate in ...or not (though you won't generally see this stated in BBC/TVL documentation).

    I appreciate that enforcing an offence that takes place inside people's homes is fundamentally difficult, but it also requires fundamental sensitivity. The abuse of law and language that BBC/TVL uses is simply not an appropriate starting point for this task, nor indeed any task in which a public authority engages with its Public.
    Last edited by Cornucopia; 14-07-2017 at 5:27 PM.
    I'm a Board Guide on the Phones & TV, Techie Stuff, In My Home,
    The Money Savers Arms and Food Shopping boards. I'm a volunteer to help the boards run smoothly, and I can move and merge threads there. Any views are mine and not the official line of moneysavingexpert.com.

    Board guides are not moderators. If you spot an inappropriate or illegal post then please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com
    • Xbigman
    • By Xbigman 15th Jul 17, 6:21 AM
    • 2,895 Posts
    • 1,153 Thanks
    Xbigman
    They reserve the right to visit me but will otherwise not contact me by email, phone or letter. Thats my definition of leaving me alone.



    Darren
    Xbigman's guide to a happy life.

    Eat properly
    Sleep properly
    Save some money
    • Cornucopia
    • By Cornucopia 15th Jul 17, 8:47 AM
    • 8,797 Posts
    • 8,188 Thanks
    Cornucopia
    They reserve the right to visit me but will otherwise not contact me by email, phone or letter. Thats my definition of leaving me alone.
    Originally posted by Xbigman
    Okay - let's hope that they do.

    From my POV, though, they are simply agreeing not to do something that they shouldn't ever have been doing in the first place. It's something of a disingenuous and manipulative gesture on their part.
    Last edited by Cornucopia; 15-07-2017 at 8:52 AM.
    I'm a Board Guide on the Phones & TV, Techie Stuff, In My Home,
    The Money Savers Arms and Food Shopping boards. I'm a volunteer to help the boards run smoothly, and I can move and merge threads there. Any views are mine and not the official line of moneysavingexpert.com.

    Board guides are not moderators. If you spot an inappropriate or illegal post then please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com
    • AG47
    • By AG47 19th Jul 17, 7:06 AM
    • 540 Posts
    • 137 Thanks
    AG47
    I e written to inform them

    No reply yet, I asked for written confirmation
    Nothing has been fixed since 2008, it was just pushed into the future
Welcome to our new Forum!

Our aim is to save you money quickly and easily. We hope you like it!

Forum Team Contact us

Live Stats

198Posts Today

1,193Users online

Martin's Twitter
  • Byebye! I'm about to stop work & twitter, to instead spend glorious time with Mrs & mini MSE. Wishing u a lovely summer. See u in 10 days.

  • WARNING Did you start Uni in or after 2012? The interest's rising to 6.1%; yet it doesnt work like you think. See https://t.co/IQ8f0Vyetu RT

  • RT @JanaBeee: @MartinSLewis Boris is the anomaly (coffee), the others are versions of normal (beer). Lots of same candidates = vote share d?

  • Follow Martin