Northampton Court Claim arrived (MCOL)

Loadsofchildren123 wrote: »

JackBasta, I have a Millennium one, but it's Copper Quarter. Have a look at my thread. When you get your Millennium Witness Statement look carefully at the landowner contract which they will exhibit to it. Is it signed by the Claimant, or another Millennium entity? If you look at the last page or two of my thread you'll see my Skeleton Argument where I delve into this. Also useful lists of breaches of the BPA Code of Practice (they were a member of BPA back then). Some of it might be relevant to you.

Remember to use the version that was in force at the time as they have changed for the worse over the years.

Exactly Fruitcake.


The different versions of the CoP are on the BPA website, if you click on "Knowledge" then "Code of Practice" the most recent (V6, Oct 2015) is at the top, then the other versions are listed underneath.
Version 5 is interesting, I posted about that in my thread, it has some interesting obligations about landowner authority which were removed from V6.

Will the judge take note of the defence and the WS side by side,

Yes he/she will read your defence to understand why you dispute the claim and what your legal arguments are... and your WS to understand the facts from your point of view.

You WS will refer back to your defence e.g.
"Re my defence point #? which states "the signage was inadequate" To support this point the defendant relies on the case of 'Dodgy PPC vs Innocent Motorist' Claim No. 123456, at ANY Court Court, 01/01/2017. Judge Bonkers made it clear that inadequate signage that is neither prominent nor easy to read is incapable or forming a contract when he said "blah blah blah....". The transcript from this case is appended to this bundle as exhibit JB1

Do I need to send full copies of those documents, or can I just send the pages that matter?

It depends, if enclosing transcripts of judgements include the full document as it will be relevant for context but highlight the specific passages you're referring to. Where referring to CoP's or the popla report just the relevant pages as the rest of the documents bear no relevance. The judge will not thank you for making him/her trawl through a lengthy document just to read one relevant paragraph

Your bundle must be page numbered in sequence from 1 through to whatever the last page is. The numbers should continue from one doc to the next. You want your bundle to be neat and easy to navigate so you can say "I refer to exhibit JB2 on page 64 of this bundle........."- the Judge will appreciate this.