IMPORTANT! This is MoneySavingExpert's open forum - anyone can post

Please exercise caution & report any spam, illegal, offensive, racist, libellous post to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com

  • Be nice to all MoneySavers
  • All the best tips go in the MoneySavingExpert weekly email

    Plus all the new guides, deals & loopholes

  • No spam/referral links
or Login with Facebook
Real-life MMD: Whose lens is it anyway?
Reply
Views: 9,458
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
# 41
ronangel
Old 21-11-2012, 7:40 PM
MoneySaving Convert
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 115
Smile

The important point here is did you sign for it?
if not......
The richard montgomery matter

ronangel is offline
Reply With Quote Report Post
The Following User Says Thank You to ronangel For This Useful Post: Show me >>
# 42
golddustmedia
Old 21-11-2012, 7:47 PM
Serious MoneySaving Fan
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 752
Default

If you had handed this into a police station and it went unclaimed for this long you would have already had it returned to you with the providence that it was yours to dispose of as you saw fit.

Had this happen when I found some jewellery on pavement outside my house, 12 weeks later it was given back to me to keep (or sell).
golddustmedia is offline
Reply With Quote Report Post
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to golddustmedia For This Useful Post: Show me >>
# 43
TBagpuss
Old 21-11-2012, 8:40 PM
Serious MoneySaving Fan
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,272
Default

Just to clarify, there is no question of illegality here, as (i) the package was addressed to the OPs home with no name, so it was addressed to the person who opened it.
(ii)It is not illegal to open post addressed to someone else. it is illegal to" intentionally delay or open a postal packet in the course of its transmission by post" Once the package has been put through you door, it is no longer in the course of it's transmission by post.
(iii) A person commits an offence if, intending to act to a person’s detriment and without reasonable excuse, he opens a postal packet which he knows or reasonably suspects has been incorrectly delivered to him.So opening a letter or package which has been wrongly delivered, in order to try to identify the sender is perfectly legal. Opening a letter or package by mistake is perfectly legal. Opening a letter or package to try to identify the correct owner is perfectly legal.Opening a package to check it isn''t anything illegal or dangerous, before deciding whether to keep it around to see whether anyone picks it up is fine.

In terms of the actual dilemma, I think the OP ought to check with neighbours as it's as least as likely that parcel was sent to the wrong numbered flat, as that it was intended for the previous occupant. However, once that is done, given the amount of time which has passed, and given that there was no seller or senders details, I do not think that it would be immoral to keep or sell the lens. However, if you are dtill worried, then as others have sugested, hand it in to the police as lost property and wait 6 weeks.
TBagpuss is online now
Reply With Quote Report Post
The Following User Says Thank You to TBagpuss For This Useful Post: Show me >>
# 44
markja55
Old 21-11-2012, 9:52 PM
MoneySaving Newbie
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 7
Smile sell it

sell it and spend the money on beer (or your fav tipple)
if they had wanted it they would have contacted you. post or visited.
markja55 is offline
Reply With Quote Report Post
The Following User Says Thank You to markja55 For This Useful Post: Show me >>
# 45
florere
Old 22-11-2012, 12:33 AM
MoneySaving Convert
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 78
Default

"Go to the estate agent in person and ask for the last tenants details"

Can't do that, the estate agent would be in deep trouble if he gave out that sort of confidential information
florere is offline
Reply With Quote Report Post
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to florere For This Useful Post: Show me >>
# 46
ronangel
Old 22-11-2012, 2:02 AM
MoneySaving Convert
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 115
Lightbulb

Quote:
Originally Posted by florere View Post
"Go to the estate agent in person and ask for the last tenants details"

Can't do that, the estate agent would be in deep trouble if he gave out that sort of confidential information
you could go to estate agent tell them about package from 6 months? ago and ask them to pass YOUR details to previous tenant to contact you if lens is theirs. All the the tenant would have to do is tell you make type and which camera it fitted and you would let them have it.
The richard montgomery matter

ronangel is offline
Reply With Quote Report Post
The Following User Says Thank You to ronangel For This Useful Post: Show me >>
# 47
therealdessie
Old 22-11-2012, 8:22 AM
MoneySaving Stalwart
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 595
Default

What concerns me about this question is not the option of whether the OP did "enough" to find the rightful owner - and many valid points either way have been made here - but the reasoning that selling it is okay if some of the money is given to charity.

The OP did nothing to 'earn' this 'windfall'. A company somewhere has made a loss in having to send out a replacement lens no doubt, and that may be their fault for not properly addressing/tracking their parcels when they send them - but that doesn't infer the OP has won a lottery of some kind as a result.

Either sell the thing and give all the money to charity or make an attempt to determine where it should go. Keeping the proceeds is ethically poor form.
therealdessie is offline
Reply With Quote Report Post
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to therealdessie For This Useful Post: Show me >>
# 48
TrickyDicky
Old 22-11-2012, 9:38 AM
MoneySaving Stalwart
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 643
Default

I dont think theres any problems. I was under the impression that anything addressed to you (ie the home address) that you didnt order was yours after a specific amount of time if you have tried to return it to the rightful owner. If there is no return address, and no one claims it within a month (or some other period of time), then it's legally yours (hence no moral problems)

This was to stop companies sending out stuff (without an order) that would be charged for at a later date if it wasnt returned.
TrickyDicky is offline
Reply With Quote Report Post
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to TrickyDicky For This Useful Post: Show me >>
# 49
joehoover
Old 22-11-2012, 9:52 AM
MoneySaving Convert
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 97
Default

Seems to be a split between people who are happy to keep it and others who are not.

The irony is by just sending one email, some people consider that going out of your way, but surely photographing the lens, making out an ebay advert, waiting for your auction to end, going to the post office to send it is actually more time consuming for you then making more effort to trace the actual owner. Funny how the pound signs in some people's eyes overlook that....
...maybe then when you post the lens it is delivered to the wrong address and you have to refund the buyer or start a lengthy claims process with the post office....watch out for karma biting your bum here.

My point is really, so what if it takes a bit of effort to trace the owner, there is gratification to be had from doing that and making someone else's day. Once I found a crap phone on the bus, old, scratched, of no value at all. But the phone would ring from abroad and I couldn't understand the language not they spoke English. The next day I tried the numbers in the phone and had the same problem (using my phone and leaving messages) Eventually someone replied, I met them at the train station and gave her the phone, she was absolutely made up, she was a Bulgarian girl, not been here long and she was amazed someone had gone to such lengths, but it held all her numbers for her friends back home, it was far more important to her. In return, I was amazed I got given a pack of biscuits. Everyone left with a sense of faith in basic human kindness.

Without knowing more information though, like was there a return address, a courier reference maybe, or was it just delivered by royal mail with a house number and no return address and no paperwork? You'd be surprised with even one nugget of information how you can trace something, if it was a courier, even without their reference you can start the ball rolling trying to trace it.

Think of the bigger picture, if it's a couriers member of staff, they may be in trouble for losing a parcel, someone else has had to probably make a great deal of effort to trace the item, the sender may have lost out too having to replace the item.
joehoover is offline
Reply With Quote Report Post
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to joehoover For This Useful Post: Show me >>
# 50
mouseboy007
Old 22-11-2012, 10:38 AM
MoneySaving Convert
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 15
Default Cost of Effort

I've read through all the posts so far and there seems to be a number of posts which say about the amount of effort that should be made to reunite the parcel with the owner.

In my opinion, there's a cost to that effort - in terms of time (sending e-mails, making calls) and money (cost of phone calls etc) and inconvenience (holding the package for a period of time, making a specific effort to contact couriers/landlords etc). Therefore, I would take the value of the goods when sold as my compensation, unless of course the person is found through this process.

If it turns out to be an organisation, such as parcel delivery company, who is found to be the 'owner' of the item (by virtue of having compensated the original recipient for a lost item claim) then I would again be inclined to keep it or ask for fair compensation for returning the item (including all the effort made above to track down the company). If you find the person, hopefully they will compensate you for the effort made in holding their parcel and tracking them down.
mouseboy007 is offline
Reply With Quote Report Post
The Following User Says Thank You to mouseboy007 For This Useful Post: Show me >>
# 51
fatal1955
Old 22-11-2012, 11:40 AM
MoneySaving Convert
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 51
Default

(comment deleted by poster)

Last edited by fatal1955; 22-11-2012 at 11:42 AM. Reason: better replies above
fatal1955 is offline
Reply With Quote Report Post
# 52
Augustus the Strong
Old 22-11-2012, 5:44 PM
MoneySaving Stalwart
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 200
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cwc1899 View Post
It is absolutely NOT yours to sell!

You should NOT have opened it and should have, straight away, taken it back to the post office with 'not known at this address' or 'return to sender' written on it.

You are a thief by the mere act of opening someone else's mail and think how you would feel if this were your parcel.

SHAME ON YOU!
This is ridiculous. It's not unreasonable to open the parcel to try and find out who it's come from.

Send it back to the Post Office with 'not known at this address' written on it. I assume you mean there was no sender's name, not no addressee. It's not your problem, anyway - just let the Post Office sort it out, and forget about it.
Augustus the Strong is offline
Reply With Quote Report Post
The Following User Says Thank You to Augustus the Strong For This Useful Post: Show me >>
# 53
milvusvestal
Old 23-11-2012, 1:14 PM
MoneySaving Convert
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 104
Default Camera Lens

Go ahead and do as you suggest.

Either the former occupier just can't be bothered to collect it, or it wasn't ordered by him/her anyway. You've done all that's expected of you and, if it came to somebody knocking on your door to claim it, you can rightfully explain that the package was unaddressed.

I imagine that's what really happened was someone ordered the lens, it wasn't delivered and they claimed on their insurance or the supplier sent them another one.
milvusvestal is offline
Reply With Quote Report Post
The Following User Says Thank You to milvusvestal For This Useful Post: Show me >>
# 54
djb77
Old 23-11-2012, 2:39 PM
MoneySaving Convert
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 17
Default

I had a similar experience to this but my parcel contained a CD. The parcel had no return address on it so we opened it (I know technically you are not supposed to open mail not address to you but did not have any alternative - to find out where to send it back to).

We have lived in the property for 35 years and we know the previous occupiers name and the name on the parcel did not belong to them either.

All that was in the parcel was the CD no note or how to identify who sent it. We ended up giving it to a charity shop.

I do not see any problem selling the lens and giving the money to charity especially as it has been over six months. Also, if you handed it back to Royal Mail and they could not find the sender (if it had no return address) what would happen to the lens then - Is it like handing something into the police after "x" months you can claim the item as your own?

If I had ordered something, had not received it I would check with the sender to see what had happened to it. They would then inform me where it was sent - I could then go a collect it from that address.

If you are still worried about selling the lens you could actually go to the letting agents if it is near and inform them that you may have a parcel for the previous tennants and an they pass on the message as it is unlikely that they would divulge any information concerning previous tennants as would be against Data Protection laws.
djb77 is offline
Reply With Quote Report Post
The Following User Says Thank You to djb77 For This Useful Post: Show me >>
# 55
hellienellie
Old 23-11-2012, 4:24 PM
MoneySaving Convert
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: hampshire
Posts: 18
Default

Ebay will have the senders address !
hellienellie is offline
Reply With Quote Report Post
The Following User Says Thank You to hellienellie For This Useful Post: Show me >>
# 56
quinechinoise
Old 24-11-2012, 2:30 PM
MoneySaving Stalwart
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 407
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hellienellie View Post
Ebay will have the senders address !
Why do people keep saying to contact Ebay? There were no details included in the parcel to suggest it came from an Ebay seller. The OP merely states they checked the value of the item using Ebay - presumably by verifying how much similar lens were selling/sold for.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MSE Debs View Post
It turned out to be a camera lens worth £180 (according to eBay)
Tbh, if the address was correct (number, post code, etc) then I'd suspect it was a competition win. I often forget what I've entered. Most companies do include a "with compliments" slip but it's conceivable that some might not.
quinechinoise is offline
Reply With Quote Report Post
The Following User Says Thank You to quinechinoise For This Useful Post: Show me >>
# 57
The Infamous Grouse
Old 26-11-2012, 7:32 AM
MoneySaving Newbie
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 12
Default

I'm a few days behind on this one but nobody else seems to have mentioned this.

It's not 100% clear from context whether the lens is a new item from a first-party seller to a customer (unlikely given the lack of invoice) or a second-hand item sent from the previous owner to a new owner.

If the latter, has the OP considered contacting the manufacturer and quoting the serial number? All optical equipment should have a unique serial number, which the manufacturer may be able to trace back to the original owner if the lens was bought directly from them or registered for warranty.

They probably won't be able to give out any information about the previous owner (Data Protection) but if they have an original name and address on file they may be able to take the lens and reunite it with, if not the current owner, then at least the person who sent it to them.

Of course this opens up a couple more possibilities for less then ethical behaviour; someone at the manufacturer could swipe it for themselves, or the original owner might get it back and sell it again rather than passing it on to whomever it was destined for in the first place. But if you start going down this route you could drive yourself crazy.

Given a lack of information about either the sender or the intended recipient I'd say the manufacturer is your best option for reuniting this with its legitimate owner.
The Infamous Grouse is offline
Reply With Quote Report Post
The Following User Says Thank You to The Infamous Grouse For This Useful Post: Show me >>
# 58
MothballsWallet
Old 26-11-2012, 12:13 PM
Fantastically Fervent MoneySaving Super Fan
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Coventry
Posts: 8,465
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tulip1 View Post
I don't really think that enough effort has been made to try and contact the previous occupiers. Emails don't always get to their destination. A phone call to the letting agent would probably be more effective.
From personal experience, some letting agents are about as much use as a chocolate wall against an ion cannon.

Plus, the letting agent can also hide behind data protection instead of offering to pass on a message.
Always ask yourself one question: What would MothballsWallet do? Then do the opposite.
14/09/1954: Remember Totskoye
MbW v UK Gov: application "completed" (whatever that means), complaint still not answered
MothballsWallet is offline
Reply With Quote Report Post
# 59
MothballsWallet
Old 26-11-2012, 12:18 PM
Fantastically Fervent MoneySaving Super Fan
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Coventry
Posts: 8,465
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cwc1899 View Post
You should NOT have opened it and should have, straight away, taken it back to the post office with 'not known at this address' or 'return to sender' written on it.
How many times do we have to explain this?

The carrier's responsibility for an item ends once it's delivered to the address stated on the label/paperwork. It's not illegal to open an item delivered to your address as long as you don't intend to deprive the actual recipient of its contents or use them to commit a criminal offence.
Always ask yourself one question: What would MothballsWallet do? Then do the opposite.
14/09/1954: Remember Totskoye
MbW v UK Gov: application "completed" (whatever that means), complaint still not answered
MothballsWallet is offline
Reply With Quote Report Post
# 60
JayD
Old 04-12-2012, 3:55 PM
MoneySaving Stalwart
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 424
Default

I agree with all the others here who say perhaps you could make more effort to track the sender. After doing ALL that you could have done to re-unite the lens with that person and if you fail, then I would say, do whatever you want with it.
JayD is offline
Reply With Quote Report Post
The Following User Says Thank You to JayD For This Useful Post: Show me >>
Reply

Bookmarks
 
 




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

 Forum Jump  

Contact Us - MoneySavingExpert.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:22 PM.

 Forum Jump  

Free MoneySaving Email

Top deals: Week of 16 July 2014

Get all this & more in MoneySavingExpert's weekly email full of guides, vouchers and Deals

GET THIS FREE WEEKLY EMAIL Full of deals, guides & it's spam free

Latest News & Blogs

Martin's Twitter Feed

profile
  • If you see 'representative' before APR it means only 51% of accepted applicants need get the advertised rate, others far more #jargonbuster
  • Starter for ten. Why after 30yrs on TV doesn't Paxo realise close striped jackets strobe? (were they too scared to tell him) #unichallenge
  • Just to say its specifically feedback on the new Ukash card (which has the tops rates) not prepaid cards in general im looking for :)

Cheap Travel Money

Find the best online rate for holiday cash with MSE's TravelMoneyMax.

Find the best online rate for your holiday cash with MoneySavingExpert's TravelMoneyMax.

TuneChecker Top Albums

  • VARIOUS ARTISTSNOW THAT'S WHAT I CALL MUSIC! 88
  • COURTEENERSHOW GOOD IT WAS
  • ED SHEERANX (DELUXE EDITION)

MSE's Twitter Feed

profile
Always remember anyone can post on the MSE forums, so it can be very different from our opinion.
We use Skimlinks and other affiliated links in some of our boards, for some of our users.