Your browser isn't supported
It looks like you're using an old web browser. To get the most out of the site and to ensure guides display correctly, we suggest upgrading your browser now. Download the latest:

Welcome to the MSE Forums

We're home to a fantastic community of MoneySavers but anyone can post. Please exercise caution & report spam, illegal, offensive or libellous posts/messages: click "report" or email forumteam@.

    More lies and contradictory statements
    • #1
    • 5th Oct 11, 4:46 PM
    More lies and contradictory statements 5th Oct 11 at 4:46 PM
    Another (female) dealing with my complaint and yet fail to answer the relevant questions.

    We have to follow the upper tribunals decision however they have reviewed the wrong assesment (that wasn't under appeal) and implemented a brand new one with a refuse to revise notification however in my responce they said that it went down to the original assesment. Rubbish

    Neither tribunal knows about my change of circumstances relating to me going onto Job seekers allowance as i was only appealing about an assesment effective October 2002 -Sepetember 2003 (Which was corrected during the complaints process). The Oct 2002 assesment based its inome from July2002 assesment.

    Are they allowed to use best available evidence for applying dividends to an assesment cause they CBA getting the info themselves.
Page 1
Welcome to our new Forum!

Our aim is to save you money quickly and easily. We hope you like it!

Forum Team Contact us

Live Stats

1,653Posts Today

8,005Users online

Martin's Twitter
  • Byebye! I'm about to stop work & twitter, to instead spend glorious time with Mrs & mini MSE. Wishing u a lovely summer. See u in 10 days.

  • WARNING Did you start Uni in or after 2012? The interest's rising to 6.1%; yet it doesnt work like you think. See RT

  • RT @JanaBeee: @MartinSLewis Boris is the anomaly (coffee), the others are versions of normal (beer). Lots of same candidates = vote share d?

  • Follow Martin