Your browser isn't supported
It looks like you're using an old web browser. To get the most out of the site and to ensure guides display correctly, we suggest upgrading your browser now. Download the latest:

Welcome to the MSE Forums

We're home to a fantastic community of MoneySavers but anyone can post. Please exercise caution & report spam, illegal, offensive or libellous posts/messages: click "report" or email forumteam@. Skimlinks & other affiliated links are turned on

Search
  • FIRST POST
    • pug_in_a_bed
    • By pug_in_a_bed 21st Dec 09, 9:00 PM
    • 1,938Posts
    • 907Thanks
    pug_in_a_bed
    Is there an easy way to learn stopping distances!
    • #1
    • 21st Dec 09, 9:00 PM
    Is there an easy way to learn stopping distances! 21st Dec 09 at 9:00 PM
    Taking my theory in a few weeks and I just cannot learn the stopping/thinking distances, if their a formula or anything that can help me?
    thanks in advance

Page 1
    • korny88
    • By korny88 21st Dec 09, 9:11 PM
    • 119 Posts
    • 49 Thanks
    korny88
    • #2
    • 21st Dec 09, 9:11 PM
    • #2
    • 21st Dec 09, 9:11 PM
    Haven't got an extra special memorable way to remember but always helps to write it down yourself.

    But hope you have good luck in your test.
  • HotLegs
    • #3
    • 21st Dec 09, 9:13 PM
    • #3
    • 21st Dec 09, 9:13 PM
    I can't help much either although the night before my theory I did an online theory test over and over until I couldn't keep my eyes open and I passed with 100%, good luck.
  • DaveMacD
    • #4
    • 21st Dec 09, 9:33 PM
    • #4
    • 21st Dec 09, 9:33 PM
    There used to be a way to remember it in old money, but having the new distances in metres sort of knackers it.
    Your base was 20 mph x2 = 40 feet
    30 x 2.5 = 75 feet
    40 x 3 = 120 feet (they convert it to 118, but it used to be 120 in the old versions)
    50 x 3.5 = 175 feet
    60 x 4 = 240 feet
    70 x 4.5 = 315 feet

    The only easy thing about the distances now is that the thinking distance goes up by 3 m per 10 mph...
    Fight Crime : Shoot Back.

    It's the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without being seduced by it.

    Support your local First Response Group, you might need us one day.
    • phunkeymonkey
    • By phunkeymonkey 21st Dec 09, 9:58 PM
    • 17 Posts
    • 28 Thanks
    phunkeymonkey
    • #5
    • 21st Dec 09, 9:58 PM
    • #5
    • 21st Dec 09, 9:58 PM
    There used to be a way to remember it in old money, but having the new distances in metres sort of knackers it.
    Your base was 20 mph x2 = 40 feet
    30 x 2.5 = 75 feet
    40 x 3 = 120 feet (they convert it to 118, but it used to be 120 in the old versions)
    50 x 3.5 = 175 feet
    60 x 4 = 240 feet
    70 x 4.5 = 315 feet

    The only easy thing about the distances now is that the thinking distance goes up by 3 m per 10 mph...
    Originally posted by DaveMacD
    That's exactly how I used to remember it. !!!!!!ed now that it's in meters - back to parrot fashion unfortunately
  • Pew Pew Pew Lasers!
    • #6
    • 21st Dec 09, 11:34 PM
    • #6
    • 21st Dec 09, 11:34 PM
    Measured stopping distances are about the most !!!!ing stupid thing ever invented.
  • computershack
    • #7
    • 22nd Dec 09, 1:33 AM
    • #7
    • 22nd Dec 09, 1:33 AM
    TBH, I'd be inclined to say it in feet. After all, it is still a valid unit of measurement in this country.
  • Premier
    • #8
    • 22nd Dec 09, 10:54 AM
    • #8
    • 22nd Dec 09, 10:54 AM
    Overall stopping distance = thinking distance + braking distance.

    thinking distance (in feet) = speed (in mph)

    braking distance (in feet) = (speed (in mph) / 20) x speed (in mph)

    so:

    overall stopping distance (in feet) = speed (in mph) + ((speed (in mph) / 20) x speed (in mph))

    1 foot = 0.3048 metres

    ... but personally I always find it odd to expect a stopping distance in metres when you are discussing a speed in miles per hour.


    [ Simple way to do the calculation in your head (for imperial measurements):
    Think of a number/speed,
    divide it by 10
    divide it by 2
    multiply by the number you first thought of
    add the number you first thought of
    ]
    Last edited by Premier; 22-12-2009 at 10:56 AM.
    • jaydeeuk1
    • By jaydeeuk1 22nd Dec 09, 11:10 AM
    • 7,462 Posts
    • 4,938 Thanks
    jaydeeuk1
    • #9
    • 22nd Dec 09, 11:10 AM
    • #9
    • 22nd Dec 09, 11:10 AM
    Stopping differences completely different a high powered sports car, a huge 4x4 and an old ford escort.

    High powered sports cars have far better brakes/suspension than your average family car allowing for much shorter breaking distances. Perhaps all round disc brakes should be made compulsory for all new cars. But then that might reduce accidents and therefore result in fewer speed cameras / income for the Govt.
  • Kilty
    The method shown for feet is fine - you get the options in metres and feet during the theory test.
  • Premier
    Stopping differences completely different a high powered sports car, a huge 4x4 and an old ford escort.

    High powered sports cars have far better brakes/suspension than your average family car allowing for much shorter breaking distances. Perhaps all round disc brakes should be made compulsory for all new cars. But then that might reduce accidents and therefore result in fewer speed cameras / income for the Govt.
    Originally posted by jaydeeuk1
    Yes, it's amazing how many drivers of fancy cars on the motorway think they can stop safely from 70mph (or more!) in 20 feet or less.
  • Pew Pew Pew Lasers!
    Stopping differences completely different a high powered sports car, a huge 4x4 and an old ford escort.

    High powered sports cars have far better brakes/suspension than your average family car allowing for much shorter breaking distances. Perhaps all round disc brakes should be made compulsory for all new cars. But then that might reduce accidents and therefore result in fewer speed cameras / income for the Govt.
    Originally posted by jaydeeuk1
    It its tyres, not brakes, that determine stopping distances. Most people who brake in an emergency do not brake nearly hard enough.
    • CHR15
    • By CHR15 22nd Dec 09, 2:04 PM
    • 4,805 Posts
    • 4,138 Thanks
    CHR15
    . Most people who brake in an emergency do not brake nearly hard enough.
    Originally posted by Pew Pew Pew Lasers!
    Agreed, which is why a lot of manufacturers introduced EBS (Emergency Brake Assist). Even my old 2001 Mondeo had it.

    Give the brakes a good hard stab and the car takes over and brakes even harder.

    With ABS too, just stamp the pedal through the floor, you can still turn too which is something else people forget to do when hurtling toward the back of a van.
    • pug_in_a_bed
    • By pug_in_a_bed 22nd Dec 09, 5:24 PM
    • 1,938 Posts
    • 907 Thanks
    pug_in_a_bed
    numbers aren't my strong point, back to the post its all over the house then...

Welcome to our new Forum!

Our aim is to save you money quickly and easily. We hope you like it!

Forum Team Contact us

Live Stats

4,609Posts Today

7,054Users online

Martin's Twitter