Your browser isn't supported
It looks like you're using an old web browser. To get the most out of the site and to ensure guides display correctly, we suggest upgrading your browser now. Download the latest:

Welcome to the MSE Forums

We're home to a fantastic community of MoneySavers but anyone can post. Please exercise caution & report spam, illegal, offensive or libellous posts/messages: click "report" or email forumteam@. Skimlinks & other affiliated links are turned on

Search
  • FIRST POST
    • bigfreddiel
    • By bigfreddiel 13th Feb 09, 9:37 PM
    • 2,628Posts
    • 1,076Thanks
    bigfreddiel
    The Dividend Letter
    • #1
    • 13th Feb 09, 9:37 PM
    The Dividend Letter 13th Feb 09 at 9:37 PM
    Yet another newsletter from Fleet Street Publications called the Dividend Letter being touted by Moneyweek this week.

    Its a high yield portfolio (HYP) method of investing.

    I would appreciate any comments on this, do any of our bb members subscibe and could they comment.

    Cheers

    fj
Page 1
    • bigfreddiel
    • By bigfreddiel 14th Feb 09, 7:05 PM
    • 2,628 Posts
    • 1,076 Thanks
    bigfreddiel
    • #2
    • 14th Feb 09, 7:05 PM
    • #2
    • 14th Feb 09, 7:05 PM
    does no one have any opinion or experince of this?

    cheers

    fj
    • Biggles
    • By Biggles 14th Feb 09, 8:23 PM
    • 6,464 Posts
    • 3,957 Thanks
    Biggles
    • #3
    • 14th Feb 09, 8:23 PM
    • #3
    • 14th Feb 09, 8:23 PM
    I have a (painful) experience of Fleet Street Publications/MoneyWeek (all part of the same company) and I avoid their myriad of publications like the plague.

    If you like the HYP theory, it's a very simple method of investing (there is a board devoted to it over on the Motley Fool site) and you really don't need a newsletter to tell you how to work out a yield.
    • dunstonh
    • By dunstonh 14th Feb 09, 8:53 PM
    • 80,987 Posts
    • 46,282 Thanks
    dunstonh
    • #4
    • 14th Feb 09, 8:53 PM
    • #4
    • 14th Feb 09, 8:53 PM
    does no one have any opinion or experince of this?
    Head Vestor does

    Fleet St Publications = assume waste of money and largely telling you nothing that you dont already know, wont be able to utilise or totally ignorant of real world scenarios.

    HYP = valid long term medium/high to high risk strategy which for most people that followed the MF examples would have seen above market average losses in recent times due to a reliance on bank shares paying good dividends.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). Comments are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice. Different people have different needs and what is right for one person may not be for another. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from a Financial Adviser local to you.
  • EdInvestor
    • #5
    • 14th Feb 09, 9:26 PM
    • #5
    • 14th Feb 09, 9:26 PM
    HYP = valid long term medium/high to high risk strategy which for most people that followed the MF examples would have seen above market average losses in recent times due to a reliance on bank shares paying good dividends.
    Originally posted by dunstonh
    Nonsense.The HYP idea is an income based strategy based on a diversified portfolio of at least 15 shares, of which a tiny minority will be banks. The Dividend Letter is written by Stephen Bland who invented the idea, and is well worth a subscription if you are new to this style of investing.
    • dunstonh
    • By dunstonh 14th Feb 09, 10:07 PM
    • 80,987 Posts
    • 46,282 Thanks
    dunstonh
    • #6
    • 14th Feb 09, 10:07 PM
    • #6
    • 14th Feb 09, 10:07 PM
    really? The HYP portfolio you posted in the past is over 45% down against the FTSE at 30% in the same period.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). Comments are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice. Different people have different needs and what is right for one person may not be for another. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from a Financial Adviser local to you.
    • jem16
    • By jem16 14th Feb 09, 10:26 PM
    • 18,132 Posts
    • 10,718 Thanks
    jem16
    • #7
    • 14th Feb 09, 10:26 PM
    • #7
    • 14th Feb 09, 10:26 PM
    Head Vestor does
    Originally posted by dunstonh
    • Biggles
    • By Biggles 14th Feb 09, 11:55 PM
    • 6,464 Posts
    • 3,957 Thanks
    Biggles
    • #8
    • 14th Feb 09, 11:55 PM
    • #8
    • 14th Feb 09, 11:55 PM
    The Dividend Letter is written by Stephen Bland who invented the idea, and is well worth a subscription if you are new to this style of investing.
    Originally posted by EdInvestor
    Whilst he may (or may not) have devised the idea that his version should contain 15 shares, and possibly even came up with the term 'HYP' for it, there's certainly nothing new about the idea of a high yield portfolio. Basically, he's just a journalist who wrote about it a lot, not an inventor.
    • Linton
    • By Linton 15th Feb 09, 9:44 AM
    • 6,133 Posts
    • 5,667 Thanks
    Linton
    • #9
    • 15th Feb 09, 9:44 AM
    • #9
    • 15th Feb 09, 9:44 AM
    really? The HYP portfolio you posted in the past is over 45% down against the FTSE at 30% in the same period.
    Originally posted by dunstonh
    Oh dear - looks like we will be moving the long standing argument on Motley Fool over to here!

    There are two points of view - one is as suggested above, that HYP is an investment strategy which has recently been unsuccessful in dealing with the credit crunch..

    The other, which I favour, is that HYP is a successful income strategy for people who need a reasonably safe and steady income with some protection against inflation. Because there is to intention to sell HYP shares, temporary ups and downs in individual share prices do not matter. What does matter is that dividends continue to be paid.

    Companies are very reluctant to cut dividends and will only do so if there are serious problems. In fact dividends will tend to rise over time as company profits increase with inflation.

    Currently my dividend income is about 7% of current share value or 4% of original cost.

    I suggest anyone who is interested goes through the posts on the MF site.
  • opinions4u
    What does matter is that dividends continue to be paid.
    Originally posted by Linton
    Not if paying a dividend out of profits that haven't actually been made affects the underlying value of the shares.

    Companies are very reluctant to cut dividends and will only do so if there are serious problems. In fact dividends will tend to rise over time as company profits increase with inflation.
    In a low inflation environment where profits in real terms are falling across the board, what use is this?

    Currently my dividend income is about 7% of current share value or 4% of original cost.
    And if the value of those companies halved again but they were stupid enough to maintain their dividends you'd have a 14% income to shout about.

    Doesn't make it a winner though.
    • jem16
    • By jem16 15th Feb 09, 11:13 AM
    • 18,132 Posts
    • 10,718 Thanks
    jem16
    The other, which I favour, is that HYP is a successful income strategy for people who need a reasonably safe and steady income with some protection against inflation. Because there is to intention to sell HYP shares, temporary ups and downs in individual share prices do not matter. What does matter is that dividends continue to be paid.
    Originally posted by Linton
    Looks like this person didn't quite understand the concept of, "as long as your dividends continue to be paid what does it matter what your capital is doing."

    http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showthread.html?t=1486859
    • dunstonh
    • By dunstonh 15th Feb 09, 11:31 AM
    • 80,987 Posts
    • 46,282 Thanks
    dunstonh
    Oh dear - looks like we will be moving the long standing argument on Motley Fool over to here!
    Not really. I think it is a valid strategy. However, I do think the MF application of it using just a small number of shares and having no lower risk, higher yielding investments makes it riskier than it needs to be.

    I suggest anyone who is interested goes through the posts on the MF site.
    Unfortunately, there isn't a lot of balance there. (although I will admit I haven't visited recently).
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). Comments are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice. Different people have different needs and what is right for one person may not be for another. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from a Financial Adviser local to you.
  • EdInvestor
    Here's a recent update of the original HY portfolio bought at the top of the market in 2000.

    Note that an investor would still have more than the original capital invested and would have received almost half that amount in income over the period. This trounces the performance of an annuity, and it is this kind of investor that the strategy is aimed at.

    Note also the comparative performance of the FTSE, -32% and a much lower dividend return..

    http://boards.fool.co.uk/Message.asp?mid=11438816&sort=whole#11439524
    • bigfreddiel
    • By bigfreddiel 15th Feb 09, 6:55 PM
    • 2,628 Posts
    • 1,076 Thanks
    bigfreddiel
    I have a (painful) experience of Fleet Street Publications/MoneyWeek (all part of the same company) and I avoid their myriad of publications like the plague.
    Originally posted by Biggles
    Hmmm..., I have had experience of Fleet Street Pubs many years ago - and it wasn't that good - I'm wondering whether or not to keep my subscription to Moneyweek going - I thinks its for the chop.

    Cheers

    fj
    • bigfreddiel
    • By bigfreddiel 15th Feb 09, 6:57 PM
    • 2,628 Posts
    • 1,076 Thanks
    bigfreddiel
    Not if paying a dividend out of profits that haven't actually been made affects the underlying value of the shares.

    In a low inflation environment where profits in real terms are falling across the board, what use is this?

    And if the value of those companies halved again but they were stupid enough to maintain their dividends you'd have a 14% income to shout about.

    Doesn't make it a winner though.
    Originally posted by opinions4u
    Feelings seem mixed on the HYP method tho' so I'm just going to keep an eye on this for now.

    Thanks to all that replied.

    fj
  • jamesd
    EdInvestor, has it managed to catch up with the Invesco Perpetual equity invcome funds yet or is it lagging even further behind than it was before?

    The HYP is a nice concept but when you can beat it easily just by buying one of the most popular funds in the UK and get lower risk as well as the greater returns it seems pointless.
    • Aegis
    • By Aegis 15th Feb 09, 8:47 PM
    • 4,735 Posts
    • 2,801 Thanks
    Aegis
    EdInvestor, has it managed to catch up with the Invesco Perpetual equity invcome funds yet or is it lagging even further behind than it was before?

    The HYP is a nice concept but when you can beat it easily just by buying one of the most popular funds in the UK and get lower risk as well as the greater returns it seems pointless.
    Originally posted by jamesd
    Presumably lower purchase charges too?
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser
    Anything I say on the forum is for discussion purposes only and should not be construed as personal financial advice. It is vitally important to do your own research before acting on information gathered from any users on this forum.
    • Biggles
    • By Biggles 15th Feb 09, 11:42 PM
    • 6,464 Posts
    • 3,957 Thanks
    Biggles
    Note that an investor would still have more than the original capital invested and would have received almost half that amount in income over the period. This trounces the performance of an annuity, and it is this kind of investor that the strategy is aimed at.
    Originally posted by EdInvestor
    Whilst I do subscribe to the general principle of high yield investing, to report a net gain of 5% over 9 years as being a success isn't really making it look too good, when you could have been getting that per annum over the same period with most savings accounts.
Welcome to our new Forum!

Our aim's to save you money quickly and easily. We hope you like it!

Forum Team Contact us

Live Stats

471Posts Today

2,198Users online

Martin's Twitter