A simple, visual model of 2016/17

12467

Comments

  • kidmugsy wrote: »
    Thank you. How about my hypothetical taxpayer. Salary £8k; taxable interest £600; dividends £40k?
    In 2016/17:

    Default order would be:
    1. Salary £8,000
    Interest £600
    Dividends £2,400
    Total: £11,000
    Covered by personal allowance

    2. Remaining dividends are: £40,000 less £2,400 = £37,600
    The basic rate band is £32,000 but £5,000 of dividends are tax-free
    5,000@0% = 0

    3.Remaining dividends are: £40,000 less £2,400 less £5,000 = £32,600
    Remaining basic rate band is £32,000 less £5,000 = £27,000
    Then is £27,000@7.5% = £2,025 tax

    4.Remaining dividends are: £40,000 less £2,400 less £5,000 less £27,000 = £5,600
    £5,600@32.5% = £1,820 tax
    Total tax = £3,845

    But the interest could be covered by the savings nil rate band so we would instead do:

    1. Salary £8,000
    Interest £0
    Dividends £3,000
    Total: £11,000
    Covered by personal allowance
    Interest £600 in savings nil-rate band = 0.
    £5,000 of dividends @0% = 0

    Remaining basic rate band = £32,000 less £5,000 less £600 = £26,400
    £26,400@7.5% = £1,980 tax

    Remaining dividends = £40,000 less £3,000 less £5,000 less £26,400 = £5,600
    £5,600@32.5% = £1,820 tax
    Total tax = £3,800
    Saving is £45
    Which is the dividends not taxed in the BRB of £600 *7.5% = £45!

    polymaff wrote: »
    As I wrote previously. does one follow the legislation, HMRC's interpretation of the legislation, or HMRC's implementation of that interpretation?

    Whilst those three differ - and, currently, by HMRC's own admission, the legislation and the implementation do differ - which is to be paramount? Stricly the legislation but, if you think that the implementation doesn't reflect the legislation, you'll have a battle proving it.

    It seems to be that there are two unknowns in this:

    1. What is HMRC's current algorithm for distributing allowances and reliefs.

    2. What will be the algorithm when it is repaired to treat the Starting Rate Allowance correctly.

    An Online Self-Assessment is the judge and jury, as far as HMRC is concerned, but that requires only one thing - that HMRC's algorithm is perfect.

    We are some way from that.

    If HMRC would release their programme's source then one could identify - after a lot of work - what is happening. In the absence of that, one can attempt to reverse-engineer the current HMRC system. This reveals what looks like a definite methodology for the distribution of allowance and reliefs but is it the perfect methodology?
    The legislation. However, sometimes it can be interpreted in different ways, hence we have so many tax cases!

    The HMRC calc is by their own admission incorrect this year: https://www.rossmartin.co.uk/sme-tax-news/2634-software-specification-error-affects-2016-17-self-assessment

    Some commercial software is calculating things correctly, however to use that you need to get an accountant and submit on paper for now.

    You can look at the HMRC calculation here if you want to look at their algorithm:

    https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/580000/2017-indi-taxnic-calc.zip

    Be warned that it is 100 pages long!
    the provision you link to, about deducting "the reliefs and allowances in the way which will result in the greatest reduction in the taxpayer's liability to income tax", is about applying the personal allowance (and the blind person's allowance, and various kinds of loss relief).

    it's not about applying the personal savings allowance, or the dividend allowance, since they are involved at step 4 of the calculation, not at step 2 or 3 - see http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2007/3/section/23
    Yes correct
    Dazed & Confused's calculation in post #4 is correct (i now think).
    Agreed
    polymaff wrote: »
    Online Self Assessment has always assumed that there is a fixed order of consumption of Allowances and Reliefs - and the representation of the Starting Rate Allowance has been based on this order. The latter may explain why the current online self-assessment process is admitted not to handle SRA correctly. In SA2016/17 just how does one define the relationship between SRA and the allowances and reliefs?
    As HMRC have admitted their calcs are wrong!

    Once you have used your personal allowance (in a way of your choosing), you look at the next £5,000 of income in the normal order non-savings, savings then dividends, if any of that £5,000 is savings then it is taxed at 0% due to the starting rate band for savings.

    (On top of this you also get the £1,000 or £500 personal savings allowance)
    i think the idea (in the legislation) is ...

    a choice of order applies to allowances and reliefs.

    SRA, and PSA, and dividend allowance, are not allowances (nor reliefs). they're tax bands (which happen to have 0% rates).

    you can choose what kinds of income to set against your allowances and reliefs. then, whatever income is left over is set against tax bands in a fixed order (non-savings, then savings, then dividends).
    Yes correct.
  • grey_gym_sock
    grey_gym_sock Posts: 4,508 Forumite
    polymaff wrote: »
    Yes, OK, but what if the £1 was £5,000?

    Before this you'd get the SRB - but now?

    EDIT: So, what are the criteria that determine when and how much of the SRB is available?

    i think:

    if you have at least £5,000 of non-savings income left over (after you've used your reliefs and allowances), then you have no SRB available.

    if you have N of non-savings income left over, where £0 < N < £5,000, then you have (£5,000 - N) of SRB available.

    of course, if you have less savings income left over (after reliefs and allowances) than you have SRB available, then you don't actually use all the available SRB.

    we are supposed to assign reliefs and allowances to minimize tax due. so if an assignment leads to wasting the SRB, with no greater compensating saving elsewhere, then we shouldn't have made that assignment after all ...
  • polymaff wrote: »
    Yes, OK, but what if the £1 was £5,000?

    Before this you'd get the SRB - but now?

    EDIT: So, what are the criteria that determine when and how much of the SRB is available?
    Then you get the £1,000 or £500 personal savings allowance.

    Criteria in my post above: Once you have used your personal allowance (in a way of your choosing), you look at the next £5,000 of income in the normal order non-savings, savings then dividends, if any of that £5,000 is savings then it is taxed at 0% due to the starting rate band for savings.
  • polymaff
    polymaff Posts: 3,903 Forumite
    First Anniversary Name Dropper First Post
    i think:

    if you have at least £5,000 of non-savings income left over (after you've used your reliefs and allowances), then you have no SRB available.

    if you have N of non-savings income left over, where £0 < N < £5,000, then you have (£5,000 - N) of SRB available.

    of course, if you have less savings income left over (after reliefs and allowances) than you have SRB available, then you don't actually use all the available SRB.

    Not unreasonable, but...
    we are supposed to assign reliefs and allowances to minimize tax due. so if an assignment leads to wasting the SRB, with no greater compensating saving elsewhere, then we shouldn't have made that assignment after all ...

    ... this is probably the issue still outstanding.

    And HMRC have rashly committed themselves to have it cracked by mid-March 2018. :)
  • polymaff
    polymaff Posts: 3,903 Forumite
    First Anniversary Name Dropper First Post
    You can look at the HMRC calculation here if you want to look at their algorithm:

    https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/580000/2017-indi-taxnic-calc.zip

    And it doesn't help that the relevant areas are in black type on a dark purple background. :(
  • Maybe George Osborne's next new job could be to provide a simple, comprehensive calculation and explanation of exactly how all this works.

    He was pleased as punch giving us the PSA and Dividend Allowance so surely he understands it all in intricate detail!
  • bigadaj
    bigadaj Posts: 11,531 Forumite
    Name Dropper First Post First Anniversary
    Maybe George Osborne's next new job could be to provide a simple, comprehensive calculation and explanation of exactly how all this works.

    He was pleased as punch giving us the PSA and Dividend Allowance so surely he understands it all in intricate detail!

    I think he's a bit busy currently.

    And comoared with the other roles which either pay very well or have high profile benefits this might not be too attractive, there's always the trust fund to fall back on in any case.
  • talexuser
    talexuser Posts: 3,498 Forumite
    Name Dropper First Post First Anniversary
    article about dividend taxation today:

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/investing/funds/pay-tax-dividends-first-time-ever/

    confirmed by a tax specialist that you can reorder the allowances to best effect for yourself but the tax office self assessment process does not do this so in certain circumstances you can pay more than is necessary if you follow their advice.
  • polymaff
    polymaff Posts: 3,903 Forumite
    First Anniversary Name Dropper First Post
    talexuser wrote: »
    ... confirmed by a tax specialist that you can reorder the allowances to best effect for yourself but the tax office self assessment process does not do this so in certain circumstances you can pay more than is necessary if you follow their advice.

    "However, he pointed out that HMRC gives individuals the ability to select which income they want to be taxed first in order to maximise their use of allowances."

    That isn't the same as either you or I have stated. He speaks of choosing order of income taxed, we, both, (I believe HMRC, too) talk of order of allowances - specifically being free to arbitrarily split the aggregate personal allowances across the three types of taxable income.

    Optimising that split is a devil of a task. I can write it out mathematically - but describing it in a simple, visual way is proving quite - err - taxing. :)
  • talexuser
    talexuser Posts: 3,498 Forumite
    Name Dropper First Post First Anniversary
    Hmm, you've lost me there. The difference between choosing the order of taxation and splitting the allowances....
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 343.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 250.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 449.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 235.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 607.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 173K Life & Family
  • 247.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 15.9K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards