Calling time on PIP

Muttleythefrog wrote: »

Bu we don't know what is on your PIP2... and neither do you unless you've got a copy recently supplied to you. For all I know you may have made a solid case for significant relevant disabilities in PIP2 that repeated at tribunal could be compelling without any contradictory evidence such as in the form of a face to face medical report (which we know does not exist). The assumption is the PIP2 is dreadful and the DWP have utilised it to deny you PIP... but that's not necessarily so.

No, no copy in the post today.
From what I have read about the assessing process, if a face to face assessment is decided that it isn't necessary it can only be for two reasons. The first is that an award can be made without a face to face assessment and the second is that if a claim made is so weak and clearly doesn't' warrant an award, no assessment needs to be carried out.

I suspect that I fall in the latter category.
I will then wait for the PIP2 to turn up and then make a final decision over the next course of action.

bigbulldog wrote: »

You make it everyone's business by the way you boast about what you have and not needing the benefit as you give it to your grand children.

YOUR A FRAUD AND A BENEFIT SCROUNGER AND SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF YOURSELF.:mad:

You know nothing about me other than the bits that I have allowed you to know. As for boasting, that's not true at all. I have worked all of my life for what we now have, even at times when I felt like giving up. Eventually, ill health took control after 45 years of constant work. Hence previous claims for ESA and DLA. Do you deny me the comforts of my past labours?
As for not needing the DLA money. That's correct, but be assured there are many 1000's also in that position that see DLA as a bit more for the 'pot'.
Unfortunately that is the system - the same amount is paid out for all - some need more some need less. Don't blame me - go and complain to the government that have decided that that is the way it is.

Fraud is where someone illegally obtains something that they are not entitled to have. Am I a fraud - or to give it the correct title - 'fraudster'? Not unless you know more about me than I do.
As for being a scrounger. Well how do you define that? Maybe I am but so long as the law allows me to make these claims then I will continue to be a scrounger.

And ashamed? Why? What makes you think that I should be?
The difference between me and others is that I don't care what people think or say about me.
Should those that use the loopholes in the tax system be ashamed? Should those in the House of Lords who sign in and go home to get their £300 a day, should they be ashamed?
Should ex MP's & Ministers who use the contacts that they had built up to further their ever increasing level of income by the backdoor, should they be ashamed?

You have no idea what you are talking about.

bigbulldog wrote: »

Your a fraud and a benefit scrounger and should be ashamed of yourself.:mad:

If you say so at the risk of repeating myself.

Ames wrote: »

I don't think he's a fraud or a scrounger, just a troll who keeps coming back with fantasies that wind everyone else up.

For a start I am not a troll. I may well be confused, angry, annoyed and unhappy with the system, but I do not wish to give the impression of trying to upset people - I just need help and advice that I can cope with doing.
I have never 'come back from somewhere else.
As for being a fantasist, I really wish I was. You have no idea of the amount of sleepless nights I have had in the past few months.
But I do have to be honest and say that given what has happened to me, be it self inflicted or not, has left me drained and with a hope that others don't have the same problems.