Is the licence fee worth it? Poll discussion

Is the licence fee worth it? This poll took place between 31 July and 7 August 2007

The TV licence fee costs £135.50 a year, for any home with a colour TV, and pays for the BBC - that's TV, radio, regional programmes and BBC online.

Is it worth it? Which of these is nearest to your view?

A. Yes. The BBC consistently produces quality output. 7% (895 votes)

B. Yes. Mainly due to BBC radio though. 2% (283 votes)

C. Yes. Public service broadcasting as a concept is important. 5% (621 votes)

D. Yes. It's a good buffer against government and tabloid power. 1% (148 votes)

E. Yes. If nothing else just so I don’t have to watch ads. 3% (390 votes)

F. Yes. All of the above. 13% (1538 votes)

G. Yes. Other reason. 1% (73 votes)

H. No. It's too costly, halve the price and its budget. 8% (996 votes)

I. No. The BBC does nothing for me, I'd stop using it to save £135.50. 12% (1500 votes)

J. No. I pay for Sky already, it's ridiculous. 11% (1378 votes)

K. No. Only BBC online is good, and I'd happily see it have ads. 2% (286 votes)

L. No. It's another tax, why should the BBC be so special? 18% (2145 votes)

M. No. All of the above. 13% (1610 votes)

N. No. Other reason. 3% (317 votes)

Total Votes: 12119

Thanks to everybody that voted :)

threadbanner.gif
«13456749

Comments

  • There are a few too many options on this poll and none of them match my view on what is a complicated issue.

    In principle, I object to having to pay for the privledge of having a tv set, which is effectively how it is administered. If I pay for Sky / Cable I should be able to opt out of BBC and not pay the fee.

    In reality I like the BBC channels and would continue to pay the fee for them, but I still disagree with the way it is administered (i.e by effectively licensing tv sets).
  • newcook
    newcook Posts: 5,001
    First Anniversary Combo Breaker First Post
    Forumite
    There are only a couple of programmes I watch on BBC these days. Probably the main good thing about it is if there is a good film on (which is v.rare for BBC) there are no adverts.

    It bugs me when I have paid a ridiculous amount for the licence only for the BBC to show repeats of shows from years ago such as Open all Hours.
    Also hearing in the news that actor X has just signed a £3m contract with them and all the bosses have given themselves a payrise/bonus - its ridiculous!
  • I think it's a waste. I don't watch BBC at all. Ever. I watch all of the channels with commercials. I would rather watch commercials and have good programming than have crap like Eastenders with no commercials. The BBC is rubbish. I'd happily get rid of all BBC channels to save £135 a year. I can't even receive most of the BBC channels anyway.
  • guest
    guest Posts: 21 Forumite
    I really think its worth it - for the radio alone - I really cant stand commercial radio ... also heroes is on bbc2


    Yes it is alot of money but what the hey! I do think we should have a choice though :beer:
  • squirreltufty
    squirreltufty Posts: 3,422 Forumite
    The BBC (at less than 40p a day) gives us:
    • world-renowned natural history programmes (Planet Earth anybody?)
    • brilliant drama: Spooks, Rome, Hustle
    • I've lost count of the number of radio channels
    • not to mention the BBC web site
    The licence fee is worth it for the above, but almost as importantly, to avoid the wall-to-wall dodgy phone-ins, reality shows and credit company adverts.
    still a SF nerd no.1:o
    Quit date: 03/09/2006 ----> £1,000s not spent on tobacco(21/03/2010).:D
  • squirreltufty
    squirreltufty Posts: 3,422 Forumite
    I think it's a waste. I don't watch BBC at all. Ever. I watch all of the channels with commercials. I would rather watch commercials and have good programming than have crap like Eastenders with no commercials. The BBC is rubbish. I'd happily get rid of all BBC channels to save £135 a year. I can't even receive most of the BBC channels anyway.
    That'll be it then.:confused:
    still a SF nerd no.1:o
    Quit date: 03/09/2006 ----> £1,000s not spent on tobacco(21/03/2010).:D
  • stphnstevey
    stphnstevey Posts: 3,224
    First Post First Anniversary Combo Breaker
    Forumite
    The licence fee is the biggest rip off going!!!!!

    No other company is allowed to forcably charge for their services, whether you use them or not. Just owning a TV (could be just to play video games) puts you under suspicion of needing a licence.

    Why does the fee only go to the BBC - there are hundreds of channels now - not all good, but loads that can easily rivel the BBC?

    The only company that is backed by the goverment and able to fine you even if you don't watch their programmes

    Just take a moment to think how absurd this is!

    Just imagine Channel Five turning up on your doorstep and fining you for having a TV, even though you don't watch their channels and then being forced into paying them a monthly fee. Yes - absurd isn't it, so why do we let the BBC do it!

    Yet, just because we have grown up with this, we except it

    At the end of the day they are just a bully. They try to push you around and force you to pay them. In any other country they would be called the Mafia

    Rant over...
  • absnasm
    absnasm Posts: 32 Forumite
    I think it's extremely important to have a forum for information that is not in thrall to big business and at the mercy of the advertisers. For that, I thank the BBC, and I do think that it's good value for money, especially considering that it pays for so many radio stations as well. Paying channels such as Sky etc are far more of a rip-off because you pay for them and the advertisers pay for them too, and you have to waste good telly-viewing time watching ads for stuff you don't need.

    However, you only need to pay for the TV licence if your telly has the capacity to receive a signal. You can keep the TV as long as you're only using it for DVDs. My boyfriend and I never watched telly any more, so we recently cancelled our cable, disconnected our ariel, and saved ourselves a lot of money each month which we were paying out for a service we didn't even use. Instead of TV, we have the internet, and we spend lots of time talking, studying, reading, and listening to music. Far more productive, and more conducive to a good relationship than hours absorbing mindless pap.
  • For all you Sky viewers that pay around £500 a year for programmes that you saw on terrestial TV up to twenty years ago, good luck! Me, I'll stick with freeview digital TV that gives me all the programmes I want except major sporting events which Mr Murdoch with all his money can rip you off by charging extra for anything that is remotely important. He'll not get a penny of my money! You deserve to pay a paultry £135 a year as a penalty for signing up to Sky!
  • tillboy
    tillboy Posts: 268 Forumite
    The BBC (at less than 40p a day) gives us:
    • world-renowned natural history programmes (Planet Earth anybody?)
    • brilliant drama: Spooks, Rome, Hustle
    • I've lost count of the number of radio channels
    • not to mention the BBC web site
    The licence fee is worth it for the above, but almost as importantly, to avoid the wall-to-wall dodgy phone-ins, reality shows and credit company adverts.

    In addition to the above two dedicated childrens channels with high quality programmes in English with no adverts for my 3 year old to watch makes this more than worth the money for me!
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 342.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 249.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 449.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 234.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 607.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 172.8K Life & Family
  • 247.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 15.8K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards