help please with Universal Wealth preservation Trust

What a surprise the individual who posted from the company had the post removed again, I think we all want to be able to see this so we can make our own judgements. From what I saw it is not saying anything bad about the other posts just her thoughts on the company she works for!

Equally but probably more importantly it shows that the company has been trying to Post but for what ever reason they are struggling to get it on, I agree with the post above that is requesting a moderator to help get the post authorised.

This whole debate has to me raised a number of issues for us all and that is why I have really got involved.

1) Assuming that the company is trying to post. (The fact they did post earlier in the week gives the impression they are trying to get something on) I understand that it has too come from a verified source so in this I agree with MSE, but I do have a problem with the apparent time it is taking. During this time we can all post about the company and make our judgements but the company can do nothing. If they are proven to have done something wrong, small or large we should see it but at the same time if they are just an ordinary company there are lots of assumptions and negativity that could ultimately affect people’s jobs and livelihood. False (I don’t know if it is or not) information is a serious threat to us all and must be balanced.

2) Why can the person / individual who is trying to post not be allowed to. Is it because they have said they are an employee? They are writing as an individual. If we take this track the ability to write will be taken from many of us. I read earlier in a Post that a poster said they were an IFA, which I don’t disbelieve (the post actually said that they had seen the presentation made by the company and they were factually correct) but if you take this line they should also be removed as we don’t know they went to the presentation or that they are an IFA. On a more generic note lots of good exposures about companies have come from people who work or used to work with companies and is anyone who says they used to work for a company not allowed to post by MSE , I think not.

3) With regards to negativity around legal threats, I don’t know if there have been or not but we should all have the right to challenge what is said about us. We have over the years gone from not being able to notify anyone about possible wrongs to having great things like this forum to let everyone know perceived wrongs or concerns, but we need to make sure the pendulum doesn’t go too far. If people are potentially threatening livelihoods this should be able to be challenged not just dismissed or put down to them being guilty for actually challenging it. It would be a sad state of affairs if an individual or company on potential libellous matters has to try and defend themselves on these legal matters on a public forum, with no or limited rights of reply. MSE states quite rightly that if you can show that a post is inappropriate, offensive and unlawful then you can have it taken down, but that they will endeavour to protect consumers interests so they will not take things down without a reason. MSE should in my view be to raise matters of advice or concern and in this instance it has done that, but I would as covered like to have a counter balance and the right of both sides, company and individuals to post their own non libellous views.

Can we please have the post reinstated from the individual or please can you repost it again and can the moderator look at getting an official reply.

Sorry for my war and peace but I think there a key fundamentals in place and I feel it is quite topical with the focus on potential False News at the moment.