The pound in my pocket
Comments
-
[FONT="]Well it's not an option is it? EU membership would be a prerequisite.[/FONT]
Of course it's an option. Plenty of countries use another country's currency as their official currency. You don't need that country's permission. For example the US dollar is the currency of Ecuador, Panama and Zimbabwe.
All the UK government would have to do is announce that from a given date the official currency of the UK is the Euro, that it will only accept payment of taxes in Euros, and all government salaries and state benefits will be paid in Euros. None of this would require permission from the EU. The rest of the country would inevitably follow suit. You would get a few stalwarts still trading in sterling but it would become like Bitcoins or the Bristol Pound.
It would be a bloody stupid option but it would still be an option.0 -
Malthusian wrote: »Of course it's an option. Plenty of countries use another country's currency as their official currency. You don't need that country's permission. For example the US dollar is the currency of Ecuador, Panama and Zimbabwe.
All the UK government would have to do is announce that from a given date the official currency of the UK is the Euro, that it will only accept payment of taxes in Euros, and all government salaries and state benefits will be paid in Euros. None of this would require permission from the EU. The rest of the country would inevitably follow suit. You would get a few stalwarts still trading in sterling but it would become like Bitcoins or the Bristol Pound.
It would be a bloody stupid option but it would still be an option.
Just to add to this, a number of non-EU countries already use the Euro namely Montenegro, Kosovo and a few of the 'micro-nations' of Europe.0 -
No, it wasn't true in 1967 and isn't true now. The years following 1967 brought inflation of up to 24% as a result.bigfreddiel wrote: »He was right wasn't he? The pound in your pocket is still worth a pound.
It was true in 1967, so surely it's true now?
A pound is still worth 100 pennies, just as it was still worth 240 pennies then, but those pennies won't buy as much as they previously did, as you'll find when you step off the ferry.
Similarly those big increases in the value of our investments that have been great fun are only increases in local terms and won't benefit us much if we want to blow the money on champers, a foreign holiday or a foreign car.
But don't fret, stick to a week in Bognor next year and you'll hardly notice.0 -
Rollinghome wrote: »
But don't fret, stick to a week in Bognor next year and you'll hardly notice.
The price of those imported toy Spanish donkeys will be noticeable though. Have to go home with a stick of rock instead.0 -
Rollinghome wrote: »No, it wasn't true in 1967 and isn't true now. The years following 1967 brought inflation of up to 24% as a result.
A pound is still worth 100 pennies, just as it was still worth 240 pennies then, but those pennies won't buy as much as they previously did, as you'll find when you step off the ferry.
Similarly those big increases in the value of our investments that have been great fun are only increases in local terms and won't benefit us much if we want to blow the money on champers, a foreign holiday or a foreign car.
But don't fret, stick to a week in Bognor next year and you'll hardly notice.
It must have been true, Harold said so! Surely he wasn't telling porkies! :rotfl:0 -
I guess we were all just as stupid then as we are now to believe anything anyone says, especially a politician
fj0 -
Harold Wilson sold us a huge porky in '67. I would have hoped those on here might understand politicians (of whatever colour) spin the facts to suit their own agenda.bigfreddiel wrote: »In 1967....
"It does not mean that the pound here in Britain, in your pocket or purse or in your bank, has been devalued."
Prime Minister Harold Wilson
He was right wasn't he? The pound in your pocket is still worth a pound.
It was true in 1967, so surely it's true now?
I remember the headlines well, and life just went on as usual. Harold must have believed it or else he wouldn't have said it.
True back in '67 and true now. All these fluctuations will be but a tiny little blip when you look back in years to come.
Cheers fj
I fear things may get a lot worse.
http://www.msn.com/en-gb/money/news/how-crashing-pound-will-hit-your-pocket-millions-of-households-warned-to-brace-for-price-rises/ar-BBxj1vP?ocid=spartandhp"A nation's greatness is measured by how it treats its weakest members." ~ Mahatma Gandhi
Ride hard or stay home :iloveyou:0 -
I can understand why the suits in the square mile don't want the euro but would it bad for the rest of us? I have seen the value of the £ in my pocket plummet against the € .... and not just since Brexit.
Just had a serious case of deja vu until I remembered reading this on Britishexpats as well :beer:0 -
Are you stalking me? <LOL>
I find it interesting to compare the differing views / opinions on this issue from both forums."A nation's greatness is measured by how it treats its weakest members." ~ Mahatma Gandhi
Ride hard or stay home :iloveyou:0 -
Rollinghome wrote: »No, it wasn't true in 1967 and isn't true now. The years following 1967 brought inflation of up to 24% as a result.
....
Inflation didnt reach 24% until 8 years later in 1975. Blaming this on a 14% devaluation in 1967 seems a little far-fetched. A far greater cause was surely economic mismanagement in the subsequent years.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 343.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 250.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 449.7K Spending & Discounts
- 235.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 607.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 173K Life & Family
- 247.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 15.9K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards