IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including QR codes, number plates and reference numbers.

Does the Cargius case still stand

1356

Comments

  • Thanks Umkomaas for your swift reply.
    Firstly apologies for my lack of attention to detail.
    The company is Premier Park Limited.
    Should we send another letter to both stating the Cargius case and maybe ask why they do not think it is relevant?
    Thanks.
  • Umkomaas
    Umkomaas Posts: 41,320 Forumite
    First Anniversary Name Dropper First Post Photogenic
    The company is Premier Park Limited.
    Right, finally (hopefully!) we've got the right marine! Too much time spent chasing ParkingEye shadows previously.

    Premier Parking Ltd have become more litigious this year compared to the previous two years. So it now seems a case of wait and see what they do next. Come back if you get a LBA or real court papers.
    Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .

    I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.

    Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.

    Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street
  • We have now received a Notice of Intended Court Action from Debt Recovery Plus Ltd.
    My wife, whose car it was (we have since sold the vehicle), is pressing me to pay.
    We have been on holiday and only opened the letter yesterday, though it was dated 14 August.
    They are asking us to pay £150 by 28.8.2017. Obviously we have missed this.
    They are again stating the Supreme Court judgement of Nov 2015.
    Should I reply with my continued stance that the Cargius case has more bearing on this case?
    Thanks in advance
  • KeithP
    KeithP Posts: 37,532 Forumite
    Name Dropper First Post First Anniversary
    Time for you to re-read this post:

    The first line of which is: IGNORE THE DEBT COLLECTORS' STAGE
  • Umkomaas
    Umkomaas Posts: 41,320 Forumite
    First Anniversary Name Dropper First Post Photogenic
    That's not a LBA. Do a Google/forum search on 'Notice of Intended Court Action Debt Recovery Plus' and see how many hundreds of others are ignoring this garbage.

    Only come back if you get a (real) LBA from Premier or their Solicitors or real court papers.

    Now is most certainly not the time to consider paying anyone!
    Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .

    I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.

    Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.

    Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street
  • beamerguy
    beamerguy Posts: 17,587 Forumite
    First Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper First Post
    edited 29 August 2017 at 6:23PM
    We have now received a Notice of Intended Court Action from Debt Recovery Plus Ltd.
    My wife, whose car it was (we have since sold the vehicle), is pressing me to pay.
    We have been on holiday and only opened the letter yesterday, though it was dated 14 August.
    They are asking us to pay £150 by 28.8.2017. Obviously we have missed this.
    They are again stating the Supreme Court judgement of Nov 2015.
    Should I reply with my continued stance that the Cargius case has more bearing on this case?
    Thanks in advance

    This is just DRP playing children again.:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:
    They have this big pram and are constantly throwing their toys out

    DRP ARE TOTAL POWERLESS and their threats are worthless.

    Someone should send a copy of the Beavis case to DRP and
    ask them to read it before making fake claims.

    THE BEAVIS CASE WAS ABOUT "THE CHARGE IS UNFAIR"

    This is just DRP utter rubbish who are trying to extort money
    from you ..... DRP = IGNORE = NO CONTACT = BIN IT


    OR .... if you feel inclined, send it to Trading Standards with
    a complaint that they are making false claims
  • Thanks to all replies and support so far.
    Just to update, now received reduced final settlement offer of £127.50 to avoid court action.
    The only action taken is to file it with the others and post on here.
  • Latest development.
    Received letter from Zenith Collections - Settlement figure reduced to £99.99.
  • beamerguy
    beamerguy Posts: 17,587 Forumite
    First Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper First Post
    Latest development.
    Received letter from Zenith Collections - Settlement figure reduced to £99.99.

    Zenith are indeed desperate, if the amount is going down, they
    might well be paying you soon.

    IGNORE THEM, they will give up and pass it back to the PPC
    and then you wait to see if the PPC or their legals has a
    suitable case to bring ?

    The problem as from the 1st Oct for the PPC and their legals
    is can they comply to the new claim procedures ???
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 343K Banking & Borrowing
  • 250K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 449.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 235.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 607.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 173K Life & Family
  • 247.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 15.9K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards