Can my employer pay less than my contracted hours?
Options
sammyboy23
Posts: 1 Newbie
This year I have received two salary statements from my employer. The first is my salary for pension purposes the second is a higher rate for working additional contracted hours. If my employer has contracted me to work these extra hours at the beginning of the year should my pension not be worked out from theses hours?
Thanks for any help.
Thanks for any help.
0
Comments
-
sammyboy23 wrote: »This year I have received two salary statements from my employer. The first is my salary for pension purposes the second is a higher rate for working additional contracted hours. If my employer has contracted me to work these extra hours at the beginning of the year should my pension not be worked out from theses hours?
In general, no. However, what's the pension scheme?0 -
It's generally scheme rules that dictate this.
My pension includes overtime payments but most don't.0 -
The above two answers, while accurate, do assume this is a "defined benefit" pension scheme where you accrue an annual pension in retirement that is equivalent to a fraction of your annual salary while working. If we are talking about a different type of scheme, particularly an auto-enrolment defined contribution scheme, then this may be quite different.I am a Technical Analyst at a third-party pension administration company. My job is to interpret rules and legislation and provide technical guidance, but I am not a lawyer or a qualified advisor of any kind and anything I say on these boards is my opinion only.0
-
PensionTech wrote: »The above two answers, while accurate, do assume this is a "defined benefit" pension scheme
On a personal level, I've experienced the opposite in terms of DB vs. DC. In my current employment contract, it's explicitly stated that only basic pay is pensionable for the company's group DC scheme, whereas when I was in the LGPS, certain things beyond basic pay were pensionable (and this list subsequently grew).0 -
Ah - then my response assumes your assumption! I do apologise. What I wanted to draw attention to is that DC auto-enrolment schemes specifically must base minimum contributions on all earned income, including overtime.
Also, another thought: though I have seen a lot of "basic pay" definitions in DB and DC schemes, "contractual earnings" or some variant is not uncommon either. As this was contracted time, not ad-hoc overtime, it'll depend even more on the specific scheme/policy wording in question (again, unless it's auto-enrolment).I am a Technical Analyst at a third-party pension administration company. My job is to interpret rules and legislation and provide technical guidance, but I am not a lawyer or a qualified advisor of any kind and anything I say on these boards is my opinion only.0 -
PensionTech wrote: »What I wanted to draw attention to is that DC auto-enrolment schemes specifically must base minimum contributions on all earned income, including overtime....
I thought the different Tiers within Auto enrolment meant that this wasn't necessarily the case and that there were various definitions of what needed to be included as pensionable pay and that depended on what Tier was declared as being the one to be adopted for a particular auto enrolled scheme. For example I thought a Tier 1 scheme was just based on basic pay excluding overtime, shift allowance, bonuses, etc and that it was just Tier 3 that included all earned income.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 343.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 250.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 449.7K Spending & Discounts
- 235.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 608K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 173.1K Life & Family
- 247.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 15.9K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards