HI, I wonder if someone could please offer some guidance? All amounts are approximate.
My father joined the RAF in '78 and left at age 40 in 2000. He commuted some of his pension to recieve a lump sum when he demobbed. He recieved £400 per month to start with and as far as we were aware his monthly pension would double to £800 when he hit age 55.
So far, so simple.
He died last month aged 51 and he and my Mother were married 31 years. My mother is still alive.
Hopefully still simple.
We were told by someone from either JPAC or Xafinity that for the first 3 months after his death my mother would recieve £800: 100% of the pension he would have been recieving now had he not commuted. We were told it would then go down to £400 after that.
We've had the letter through today and yes, in three months time she will recieve about £400. But for the first three months she will only recieve £450.
This has come as a bit of a shock compared to what we were expecting, I accept that life is like that sometimes, but I want to make sure this is actually correct and aside from asking us to send back a photocopy of the letter pointing out the errors, JPAC can't tell us if there's actually been an error because they're not allowed to talk to the people that calculate the pension amounts.
Does anyone know if their calculation was vaguely correct?
EDIT, the AFPS booklet states the following:
Short term family pension (first 3 months) worked out as follows:
"This pension is based on your daily rate of pensionable pay,
if you are still in Service when you die, or the daily pension rate if you die in retirement."
Widows Pension:
"if you die in retirement, we will pay your widow one half of the pension the scheme paid you before your death. This applies to that part of a pension earned through service given after 31 March 1973"
So by their calculations his "daily rate of pensionable pay" was £400 but "the pension the scheme paid you before your death" is considered to be £800.
Have I interpreted this correctly????? Or are those definitions just badly written and both mean the same thing and the pensions people have calculated wrong?
Thanks so much to anyone who manages to get to the bottom of this post.