Your browser isn't supported
It looks like you're using an old web browser. To get the most out of the site and to ensure guides display correctly, we suggest upgrading your browser now. Download the latest:

Welcome to the MSE Forums

We're home to a fantastic community of MoneySavers but anyone can post. Please exercise caution & report spam, illegal, offensive or libellous posts/messages: click "report" or email forumteam@.

Search

Results: IS Mental Health an escape Goat for reducing Benefits bill?

Yes

38.10% • 40 votes

No

46.67% • 49 votes

I don't Know

15.24% • 16 votes

You may not vote on this poll

105 votes in total.

  • FIRST POST
    • Bulldog-1979
    • By Bulldog-1979 8th Apr 17, 1:28 AM
    • 8Posts
    • 5Thanks
    Bulldog-1979
    failed ESA medical because husband hasnt attempted to commit suicide!
    • #1
    • 8th Apr 17, 1:28 AM
    failed ESA medical because husband hasnt attempted to commit suicide! 8th Apr 17 at 1:28 AM
    I apologise in advance for the long message but this is unbelievable!
    My husband suffers from: Depression, Anxiety & has a myocardial bridge - He was in the Support Group for ESA until 15th last month when the ESA was stopped as he scored "0" in the medical!?.....

    I did a mandatory reconsideration because the person got it wrong and said things my husband could do - that he didn't say!

    In the meantime we went to claim JSA (I went with him as he struggles going out on his own) - We were sent back from the JC saying he isnt well enough to claim- they said it was obvious he wasn't well! shaking sweating white - blue lips allsorts! - got told we need to make a new claim for ESA - so went home and tried - they said we couldnt and i needed to take him in to JC again - made another appt - the same thing happened again! - phoned ESA - same thing! - phoned JC and said i wont do it to my husband and bring him in again - they said that i need to get sick note off Dr saying he is worse and to do a fresh claim for ESA!

    After 2 weeks of messing around with this someone FINALLY took the application but wanted another sick note off the Dr as it only said "Depression" signed off for 3 months - Dr was not happy that they questioned her medical opinion so she wrote another one detailing hwo he has gone worse and the max of her tablets she could prescribe and that he has been referred to mental health team.

    in the meantime - Yep you guessed it - we found out they upheld their decision!!! one of the paragraphs which stated that the health care professional had no reason to lie!!!!?????
    -so the Dr and myself and my husband must have!

    It gets worse............

    ..blah blah... "You are able to engage in conversation with people and have no recent history of dis-inhibited or aggressive behaviour. You have mental health problems and report occasional suicidal thoughts but you have not acted on these and have no fixed plan or intent.
    You have no psychiatric input and have had no hospital admissions for a number of years."
    (he has previously been sectioned for a number of months for trying to commit suicide!)

    .................. I don't know what to say!..... We have just found out that his new claim has been accepted and it was backdated to 15th - HOWEVER - as its a new claim they don't pay the 1st 7 days AND the amount is reduced due to him having to wait for the 13 week assessment before he can be put on support group again (if he passes they said!!!)

    Apart from having a rant (I apologise) is this Normal/Acceptable? - Is there anything i can do?

    I have rent i have to pay which i've not been able to and now we get less by approx £60 a week?
    Last edited by Bulldog-1979; 08-04-2017 at 1:30 AM.
Page 1
    • DevilsMoJo
    • By DevilsMoJo 8th Apr 17, 2:13 AM
    • 16 Posts
    • 17 Thanks
    DevilsMoJo
    • #2
    • 8th Apr 17, 2:13 AM
    • #2
    • 8th Apr 17, 2:13 AM
    Hello Bulldog

    This is normal but it's not acceptable.

    You should print off the SSCS1 form, fill it in and send it to the Independent Tribunal asap.

    I hope you win against these wicked people
    • Bulldog-1979
    • By Bulldog-1979 8th Apr 17, 2:36 AM
    • 8 Posts
    • 5 Thanks
    Bulldog-1979
    • #3
    • 8th Apr 17, 2:36 AM
    • #3
    • 8th Apr 17, 2:36 AM
    Thanks for commenting - Ive been told I cant send it to a tribunal because we have a new claim?
    • poppy12345
    • By poppy12345 8th Apr 17, 6:15 AM
    • 1,767 Posts
    • 1,592 Thanks
    poppy12345
    • #4
    • 8th Apr 17, 6:15 AM
    • #4
    • 8th Apr 17, 6:15 AM
    I apologise in advance for the long message but this is unbelievable!
    My husband suffers from: Depression, Anxiety & has a myocardial bridge - He was in the Support Group for ESA until 15th last month when the ESA was stopped as he scored "0" in the medical!?.....

    I did a mandatory reconsideration because the person got it wrong and said things my husband could do - that he didn't say!

    In the meantime we went to claim JSA (I went with him as he struggles going out on his own) - We were sent back from the JC saying he isnt well enough to claim- they said it was obvious he wasn't well! shaking sweating white - blue lips allsorts! - got told we need to make a new claim for ESA - so went home and tried - they said we couldnt and i needed to take him in to JC again - made another appt - the same thing happened again! - phoned ESA - same thing! - phoned JC and said i wont do it to my husband and bring him in again - they said that i need to get sick note off Dr saying he is worse and to do a fresh claim for ESA!

    After 2 weeks of messing around with this someone FINALLY took the application but wanted another sick note off the Dr as it only said "Depression" signed off for 3 months - Dr was not happy that they questioned her medical opinion so she wrote another one detailing hwo he has gone worse and the max of her tablets she could prescribe and that he has been referred to mental health team.

    in the meantime - Yep you guessed it - we found out they upheld their decision!!! one of the paragraphs which stated that the health care professional had no reason to lie!!!!?????
    -so the Dr and myself and my husband must have!

    It gets worse............

    ..blah blah... "You are able to engage in conversation with people and have no recent history of dis-inhibited or aggressive behaviour. You have mental health problems and report occasional suicidal thoughts but you have not acted on these and have no fixed plan or intent.
    You have no psychiatric input and have had no hospital admissions for a number of years."
    (he has previously been sectioned for a number of months for trying to commit suicide!)

    .................. I don't know what to say!..... We have just found out that his new claim has been accepted and it was backdated to 15th - HOWEVER - as its a new claim they don't pay the 1st 7 days AND the amount is reduced due to him having to wait for the 13 week assessment before he can be put on support group again (if he passes they said!!!)

    Apart from having a rant (I apologise) is this Normal/Acceptable? - Is there anything i can do?

    I have rent i have to pay which i've not been able to and now we get less by approx £60 a week?
    Originally posted by Bulldog-1979
    That's awful but is there any reason you didnt send it to Appeal Tribunal as most MR decisions remain the same?
    • NeilCr
    • By NeilCr 8th Apr 17, 7:15 AM
    • 1,100 Posts
    • 1,218 Thanks
    NeilCr
    • #5
    • 8th Apr 17, 7:15 AM
    • #5
    • 8th Apr 17, 7:15 AM
    I am slightly confused about this. It does seem surprising that they allowed a new claim so quickly after the ESA was stopped with no points I must say

    If you appeal to a tribunal the ESA will be reinstated.

    You say you have been told that you can't take it to a tribunal now you have a new claim. Who by?

    Someone more knowledgable than me, like Alice, will be along to clarify, hopefully, but my sense is to suggest that you go to CAB or similar as soon as possible for clarification. You'll need to do it quickly because of the time limit of four weeks to get the SSC1 in. If that's not possible I'd send the SSC1 anyway and see what they actually say on receipt
    • Londonsu
    • By Londonsu 8th Apr 17, 7:29 AM
    • 1,327 Posts
    • 2,834 Thanks
    Londonsu
    • #6
    • 8th Apr 17, 7:29 AM
    • #6
    • 8th Apr 17, 7:29 AM
    Sorry to be pedantic but its not escape goat its scapegoat
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scapegoat
    • paragon909
    • By paragon909 8th Apr 17, 8:12 AM
    • 1,247 Posts
    • 1,244 Thanks
    paragon909
    • #7
    • 8th Apr 17, 8:12 AM
    • #7
    • 8th Apr 17, 8:12 AM
    Sorry to be pedantic but its not escape goat its scapegoat
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scapegoat
    Originally posted by Londonsu
    One can't apologies for being a sad pathetic troll. Am not sure the OP has time to worry about a space or a joint word!
    • FBaby
    • By FBaby 8th Apr 17, 8:39 AM
    • 16,130 Posts
    • 40,036 Thanks
    FBaby
    • #8
    • 8th Apr 17, 8:39 AM
    • #8
    • 8th Apr 17, 8:39 AM
    Many people work whilst suffering from depression and taking antidepressants and same with a myocardial bridge which is most instances is harmless, so these diagnosis alone is not a door to claiming esa.

    You therefore need to provide evidence as to how these two conditions are preventing him from engaging in work. If indeed he is not under the care of a consultant, or receiving regular intense therapy, how is the DWP to be reassured that your husband is indeed incapable of work?

    It sounds like you need more clinical evidence of how his conditions are preventing him from working. Do you have a detailed letter from his GP stating that his anxiety/depression is too severe to consider engaging in work? Is he on the waiting list for counselling?
    • Tolly_T
    • By Tolly_T 8th Apr 17, 9:15 AM
    • 120 Posts
    • 111 Thanks
    Tolly_T
    • #9
    • 8th Apr 17, 9:15 AM
    • #9
    • 8th Apr 17, 9:15 AM
    You have no psychiatric input and have had no hospital admissions for a number of years.
    This makes me so angry. Many years ago lack of a psychiatrist might have been a useful indicator of the severity of a claimant's illness but not these days.

    There is not enough funding for mental health services and this means they have changed how they work, at least in my area. Patients are managed far more by their GP with a referral to a psychiatrist for advice as needed but they'll be discharged back to their GP very quickly.

    Inpatient treatment isn't good for patients. As a last resort it may be necessary but services acknowledge that inpatient treatment can affect patients quite badly so they won't be admitted as often as they used to be years ago. This is more likely to be the reason that he hasn't had any hospital admissions for a number of years rather than it being because his mental health has improved. Add to that the lack of funding, reduced numbers of inpatient beds etc. etc.

    Another problem is that after many years of treatment for mental health problems a patient is likely to have tried many of the medications and therapies available and often will know what works and what doesn't, and possibly will have found that nothing works for them. Why would someone keep going back to a psychiatrist when they don't believe they will help?

    the health care professional had no reason to lie!!!!?????
    Plenty of the assessors lie but lets assume this one didn't. Isn't it possible that they just got it wrong? DWP staff need to understand that it isn't possible to use observations during a short assessment and a few simple indicators (lack of psychiatrist, no recent suicide attempt) to assess the impact that a mental illness has on a claimant. They need to go back to trusting GP reports and to a certain extent trusting what the claimant says. The current system isn't working. I realise trusting what a claimant says is frowned on because of the potential for fraudulent claims but when someone has a long history of mental illness along with being sectioned it's less likely that the claimant will have no problems. Mental health treatment isn't that good for such severe illnesses and problems are likely to remain, varying in severity over time, rather than completely disappear after treatment.

    I'm sorry I don't have any advice. It does seem to be normal but it shouldn't be accepted. Hopefully it will all be sorted out with the current claim. I'd encourage you to let your MP know the problems that you've had. I'm sure they're aware of the problems but it makes it real when they meet people who have been directly affected.
    • pmlindyloo
    • By pmlindyloo 8th Apr 17, 10:08 AM
    • 10,903 Posts
    • 12,785 Thanks
    pmlindyloo
    I wonder if this will help.

    Getting ESA whilst appealing

    On or after 30 March 2015 if you are appealing against a decision that you have failed the Work Capability Assessment(WCA), then depending on the facts, you can still be treated as having limited capability for work and so be entitled to ESA whilst appealing in the following situations;

    if the WCA failure that you are appealing against is the first such failure (or the first since a previous decision that you passed the WCA),
    where the WCA failure that you are appealing is the second or subsequent WCA failure and your condition has got significantly worse or you have a new health condition.

    I think the new claim was allowed because the doctor eventually wrote that the claimant's condition had worsened?

    I also think the appeal can go ahead for the original claim.

    I agree that help from CAB asap because of the time limits should be a priority.

    Trouble is the call centre staff are just not trained properly and it is hit or miss whether you get someone who knows the 'rules'.
    • rockingbilly
    • By rockingbilly 8th Apr 17, 10:12 AM
    • 838 Posts
    • 249 Thanks
    rockingbilly
    They need to go back to trusting GP reports and to a certain extent trusting what the claimant says. The current system isn't working. I realise trusting what a claimant says is frowned on because of the potential for fraudulent claims but when someone has a long history of mental illness along with being sectioned it's less likely that the claimant will have no problems. .
    .
    Originally posted by Tolly_T
    Unfortunately a GP is not normally in a knowledgeable position to give a report into how patients cope with life. There are descriptors that make up both ESA and PIP - how on earth could a GP make any comment on these if he/she has not witnessed them on a daily basis?
    This is why a report from an OT (probably one that is involved with Social Services) is the best evidence that could be obtained.
    If the DWP were to start trusting what claimants had claimed where would that leave us? There would be a certain sector of society that would immediately start to abuse that.
    It was even highlighted in the recent 2nd PIP report that the DWP distrust evidence from friends, relatives and carers as they too could be biased.
    Where does that leave us?
    You have to demonstrate on the balance of probabilities that the assessor has lied.
    • pmlindyloo
    • By pmlindyloo 8th Apr 17, 10:16 AM
    • 10,903 Posts
    • 12,785 Thanks
    pmlindyloo
    QUOTE

    You have mental health problems and report occasional suicidal thoughts but you have not acted on these and have no fixed plan or intent.
    You have no psychiatric input and have had no hospital admissions for a number of years." (he has previously been sectioned for a number of months for trying to commit suicide!)

    This is where medical evidence is a must - was the letter about his being sectioned sent as evidence? If so then this can be used in the appeal to refute the assessor's findings. Or if it wasn't sent then it needs to be.
    • Alice Holt
    • By Alice Holt 8th Apr 17, 10:27 AM
    • 1,583 Posts
    • 1,685 Thanks
    Alice Holt
    You should still be able to take the appeal to the Tribunal Service:
    This is the form:
    https://formfinder.hmctsformfinder.justice.gov.uk/sscs001-eng.pdf
    You need to send it with the MRN attached within 1 month of the date of the MRN.

    As you now have successfully re-applied for ESA, the tribunal's decision will be time limited.
    It will consider the period between the date the DWP declined the first ESA renewal claim and the date the current ESA award was granted. If the tribunal allows your appeal you will get a backpayment for this period only. In other words, the period during which ESA was not in payment.
    However, I'm not clear from your post how long this period was. So I would second NeilCr's suggestion that you visit your local CAB.
    https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/about-us/how-we-provide-advice/advice/
    Take all the paperwork with you.
    The tribunal will look at your husband's condition at the date of the decision to disallow the initial ESA claim.

    Here are useful guides to appeals:
    http://www.advicenow.org.uk/guides/how-win-pip-appeal (It relates to PIP, but the appeal process is virtually the same).
    http://www.benefitsandwork.co.uk/employment-and-support-allowance/esa-appeals
    https://www.leicester.gov.uk/media/182136/employment-and-support-allowance-appeals-guide.pdf
    https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/benefits/sick-or-disabled-people-and-carers/employment-and-support-allowance/while-youre-getting-esa/challenging-an-esa-decision/

    You may need to think carefully about a further appeal if the DWP place him in the WRAG group for his current ESA claim (especially if the tribunal places your husband back into the SG for the backdate period), Get advice from the CAB on this.

    Here are the Support Group descriptors:
    http://www.benefitsandwork.co.uk/employment-and-support-allowance/esa-glossary/1353-support-group-descriptors
    Your husband could also be assigned to the SG on Regulation 35 -
    http://www.cpag.org.uk/content/making-exception
    - If if participation in the WRAG activities would mean there was a substantial risk to the claimants mental or physical health (or to others).

    Edit: I would strongly suggest that the OP ignores any (mis)information posted by rockingbilly.
    See these threads - http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showthread.php?t=5626671
    and http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showthread.php?t=5617003.

    Medical evidence is very important evidence, and often determines the success or otherwise at tribunal.
    The How to win a PIP appeal is useful on getting medical evidence from the GP relating to the descriptors.
    All relevant evidence is helpful - carers, family, friends, CPN, other health professionals.
    The key to a successful outcome at tribunal is to produce the evidence, so that on the balance of probabilities given all the evidence in front of them the tribunal panel will allow the appeal.
    The verbal evidence of the appellant is also very important - so preparation, knowing how you score the necessary points, and examples to back that up really help.

    Good luck.
    Last edited by Alice Holt; 08-04-2017 at 11:55 AM. Reason: Update
    • jaylee3
    • By jaylee3 8th Apr 17, 10:48 AM
    • 1,847 Posts
    • 4,703 Thanks
    jaylee3
    I am a little bit confused OP. So has your husband now been accepted for ESA then?

    Also, I voted no to the poll, because although there are many genuine cases of mental health issues, and depression etc, there are also many that swing the lead, and don't actually have that much wrong with them. Many of the latter most likely had a time when they were quite low and depressed and were written off work long-term with depression, but instead of returning when they got a bit better, they just stayed off. I think in many cases, they got so used to being at home, that they didn't want to go back to work.

    This is understandable, but too many people are off work with depression who really could work. As has been said (on here quite often,) depression is the new 'bad back.' I mean, pre mid 1990's, no-one was ever off work with depression, (no-one I knew anyway,) and I don't recall there ever being any benefits for it.

    So the DWP need to ensure that anyone who is claiming the benefit is entitled to it. With illnesses you can't see (IYSWIM,) it can be hard to prove anything; and it's especially hard if the person has not been to the doctors for several years, or had any meds, or seen a specialist etc...

    I am sure your husband is a genuine case, and I am sorry he is suffering, and I know some of these assessors (and the company they represent like ATOS for example,) have behaved badly in the past, but at the same time, I don't think on this occasion, that the assessor has done anything wrong.

    I wish you and your husband well. Sounds like he is quite poorly.
    (•_•)
    )o o)╯
    /___\
    • IAmWales
    • By IAmWales 8th Apr 17, 10:57 AM
    • 1,862 Posts
    • 3,854 Thanks
    IAmWales
    QUOTE

    You have mental health problems and report occasional suicidal thoughts but you have not acted on these and have no fixed plan or intent.
    You have no psychiatric input and have had no hospital admissions for a number of years." (he has previously been sectioned for a number of months for trying to commit suicide!)

    This is where medical evidence is a must - was the letter about his being sectioned sent as evidence? If so then this can be used in the appeal to refute the assessor's findings. Or if it wasn't sent then it needs to be.
    Originally posted by pmlindyloo
    The date of the section is important here. If it was a number of years ago then it could be indicative of an ongoing condition, but would not be directly relevant to his current condition without further evidence.

    I do agree that medical evidence is key. A detailed GP letter would be helpful, but a letter from a psychiatrist or other mental health professional would be even more so. Thousands of people claim ESA for mental health conditions without need for appeal, and key to these claims is supporting evidence.
    • theartfullodger
    • By theartfullodger 8th Apr 17, 11:21 AM
    • 9,116 Posts
    • 12,084 Thanks
    theartfullodger
    One can't apologies for being a sad pathetic troll. Am not sure the OP has time to worry about a space or a joint word!
    Originally posted by paragon909
    A somewhat intemperate response to a perfectly calm, polite post: From a "paragon"?

    Surely with benefit applications/appeals etc one key thing is to be very careful to get all information provided correct, and attention to detail matters: If the assessors have any way of wriggling out of an award because of a slightly sloppily worded form they will: These things matter! (Sadly..)

    Having said that, "escape goat" is a more charming wording...

    (dear Holman Hunt's painting...)
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Scapegoat_(painting)
    Last edited by theartfullodger; 08-04-2017 at 11:26 AM.
    • jaylee3
    • By jaylee3 8th Apr 17, 11:28 AM
    • 1,847 Posts
    • 4,703 Thanks
    jaylee3
    The date of the section is important here. If it was a number of years ago then it could be indicative of an ongoing condition, but would not be directly relevant to his current condition without further evidence.

    I do agree that medical evidence is key. A detailed GP letter would be helpful, but a letter from a psychiatrist or other mental health professional would be even more so. Thousands of people claim ESA for mental health conditions without need for appeal, and key to these claims is supporting evidence.
    Originally posted by IAmWales
    100% agree with this. Particularly the second paragraph.

    A friend of mine has a chronic illness (diagnosed about 10 years ago,) and is on a number of meds. She has blood tests every other month to monitor her blood to ensure the meds are not affecting her blood and internal organs. In addition, she attends a clinic every 4 months where a specialist monitors her condition, and twice a year she goes to hospital for X-rays to see if the condition is deteriorating (which it is slowly.) The doctors and the specialists have seen strong and obvious signs of her condition, and it has been recorded on her medical file many times, most recently only 8-10 weeks ago.

    She was asked to reapply for ESA last year, she filled in the form, and received a letter a few weeks later, asking her to attend an assessment. The lady who saw her, (who was an ex nurse who specialised in my friend's condition,) said 'you have a file 2 inches deep here, and you have clearly been suffering with this for many years; I don't even know why you were called in.'

    Then she asked her a couple of very basic questions, and then said 'OK, that's it, I am sorry you were dragged in when there was no need, there won't be any problems...' And 2 weeks later, she got the letter through saying she was remaining on ESA in the Support Group.

    So yes indeed, the evidence, the continued visits to the specialists and the doctors, and being on so many meds helped her enormously. If there has been nothing for a number of years, it's not surprising that the DWP and assessors etc think there may be very little wrong. Not saying there is nothing wrong with the OP's husband of course, just that it's easy to understand why they think this way if someone has zero evidence (or very little) of an illness.

    And as has been said, getting evidence of a mental illness or depression is very hard. Never, or hardly ever seeing specialists and not having any meds and rarely seeing the doctor is not going to go in anyone's favour.
    (•_•)
    )o o)╯
    /___\
    • jaylee3
    • By jaylee3 8th Apr 17, 11:33 AM
    • 1,847 Posts
    • 4,703 Thanks
    jaylee3
    I thought the response from paragon was a bit harsh too.

    Have to say the OP putting 'escape goat' instead of scapegoat did make me chuckle. I mean that in a nice way, I'm not being horrible OP!

    Reminds me of a few weeks ago; someone was talking about keeping their puppy out of the upstairs, and someone suggested getting a baby gate, and they put baby goat instead.

    Something to do with their phone auto-correcting wrongly or something!
    (•_•)
    )o o)╯
    /___\
    • SingleSue
    • By SingleSue 8th Apr 17, 12:19 PM
    • 10,028 Posts
    • 56,167 Thanks
    SingleSue

    As has been said (on here quite often,) depression is the new 'bad back.' I mean, pre mid 1990's, no-one was ever off work with depression, (no-one I knew anyway,) and I don't recall there ever being any benefits for it.
    Originally posted by jaylee3
    I was, way back in early 1994 (ok just before mid 1990's). Didn't claim any benefits apart from sick pay from work though. I eventually gave up work as I was in no fit state to be there and I felt guilty costing them money through sick pay. I returned to work at a different company when I felt well enough to go back to work ( over 6 months later).

    Still didn't claim anything though (more from ignorance than design) and as a result, we lost our house.
    We made it! One graduated, 2 currently at university, been hard work but it shows there is a possibility of a chance of normal (ish) life after a diagnosis (or two) of ASD. It's not been the easiest route but I am so glad I ignored everything and everyone and did my own therapies with them.
    Eldests' EDS diagnosis 4.5.10, mine 13.1.11 eekk!
    • Tolly_T
    • By Tolly_T 8th Apr 17, 1:02 PM
    • 120 Posts
    • 111 Thanks
    Tolly_T
    Unfortunately a GP is not normally in a knowledgeable position to give a report into how patients cope with life. There are descriptors that make up both ESA and PIP - how on earth could a GP make any comment on these if he/she has not witnessed them on a daily basis?
    This is said so often but I don't agree. How can an assessor for ESA or PIP give a report into how patients cope with life if they haven't witnessed them on a daily basis? I'd trust a report from a GP who has known the patient for many years and probably spoken to them many times about the problems that they have over and above an assessor or an OT who is only likely to meet them briefly to conduct an assessment.

    With mental health problems trust has to come into it. My GP does ask about several things that would be relevant to PIP when she's assessing me. There are signs specific to me and how depression affects me and my GP has got to know me over many years and knows these signs. There isn't a blood test to confirm that I am suffering with depression and other mental illnesses, the diagnoses were based on what I told my GP or psychiatrist. My GP, or previously my psychiatrist, could write a very good report supporting me but it would still based on what I told them in the first place. This is true for many physical problems too, particularly where pain causes the difficulty - no-one else can experience that pain so the GP has to believe what they're being told in order to try to treat it.
Welcome to our new Forum!

Our aim is to save you money quickly and easily. We hope you like it!

Forum Team Contact us

Live Stats

3,689Posts Today

6,763Users online

Martin's Twitter
  • Have a lovely weekend folks. Don't do anything (fiscally) that I wouldn't do!

  • RT @thismorning: With his last deals of the year, @MartinSLewis wishes us all a 'very merry Christmas, a happy Hanukkah and a wonderful and?

  • RT @stoneygran: @MartinSLewis I furtively used a pub toilet last night before getting on the bus and felt really guilty!

  • Follow Martin