can i cancel my pension?

Options
2

Comments

  • lisyloo
    lisyloo Posts: 29,615 Forumite
    Name Dropper First Anniversary First Post
    Options
    The big stories that won't go away in this weekend's press are how we are going to be surprised that 18% stock market growth in 2005 may still result in lower pension estimates on our annual future estimates

    How does that work then???
    Actually this makes no difference at all.It's a common misconception that there's additional growth on the tax relief, but there isn't.

    I don't understand that. Please could you explain.
    Surely if you invest £100 then you would get more growth than you would if you invested £78 (assuming same charges and rate of growth).
    The % is the same, but the actual amount you get is higher.
    E.g. at 5% on £100, you'd get £5 on £78 you'd get £3.90, so you're £1.10 better off, aren't you??
    The equivalent ISA investment to a pension would be a Stocks and Shares ISA, max 7k a year.

    My arguments remain the same.
    1) Some people are already using this.
    2) For some people it's not enough.
    (I accept it's probably fine for the average £24K earner).
    The main thing I wanted to remind Moneysavers about was that once the money is put into a pension, you can't get it out.

    I agree, but I think they should also bear in mind all the other points, so I'm glad this discussion has taken place.
    whoever is the chancellor can decide if they want to change that figure

    In BOTH cases, the government can change the rules.
    Both pensions AND ISAs are subject to whatever the tax regime is at the time.
    The government did a few years ago take billions from pensions by removing tax relief on dividends.
  • EdInvestor
    EdInvestor Posts: 15,749 Forumite
    Options
    lisyloo wrote:
    I don't understand that. Please could you explain.
    Surely if you invest £100 then you would get more growth than you would if you invested £78 (assuming same charges and rate of growth).

    The latest exhaustive discussion on this is [url=http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showthread.html?t=134712&page=1&pp=10]here[/url] ;)
    Trying to keep it simple...;)
  • lisyloo
    lisyloo Posts: 29,615 Forumite
    Name Dropper First Anniversary First Post
    Options
    Thanks for the info.
    I feel really dumb because I have a BSC in maths (don't tell anyone :-)
    It certainly is counter-intuitive.
  • Nick_C_4
    Nick_C_4 Posts: 110 Forumite
    Options
    Quote:
    The big stories that won't go away in this weekend's press are how we are going to be surprised that 18% stock market growth in 2005 may still result in lower pension estimates on our annual future estimates



    How does that work then???

    I assume this is because annuity rates have gone down again recently.....can you explain more ReportInvestor?
  • lisyloo
    lisyloo Posts: 29,615 Forumite
    Name Dropper First Anniversary First Post
    Options
    Actually this makes no difference at all.It's a common misconception that there's additional growth on the tax relief, but there isn't.

    Just had another thought and whilst I think this works mathematically I'm not sure it works in practice.

    What we are saying is that if you money in a pension, get tax relief and get compound growth then it is the same as putting it in an ISA ,getting compound growth and then getting tax relief (by putting the whole lot in a pension).

    I don't think the last bit will work becuase tax relief is just that, it's relief on tax THAT YOU HAVE PAID. As a general rule you can't get back more relief than tax you've paid.
    So let's say in 30 years time you have £300K in your ISA and you want to get £84K in tax relief then you won't be able to because you haven't paid £84K tax in that tax year (unless you are extremely rich in which case you aren't a basic rate tax payer anyway).

    If I'm wrong then please let me know, but I'm pretty sure this is how tax relief works. It's is "relief" i.e.you have to have paid it first. It's not a free unlimited bonus.

    So whilst I agree with the maths, I don't think our current tax laws allow it.
  • Nick_C_4
    Nick_C_4 Posts: 110 Forumite
    Options
    lisyloo, you're right that you're limited in the tax relief you can claim by the tax you've paid in a given year. The principle is still true, though, up to that limit. If you want to put £84K into a pension later, and you only earn £30, you'll have to spread it across several tax years.
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 116,371 Forumite
    Name Dropper First Anniversary First Post Combo Breaker
    Options
    That is the issue with putting it off. You will have to remember to review it a number of tax years before you finish work to ensure that if pension is the way to go, you have sufficient allowances to cover the contribution.

    There are some risks as well. If you are unable to work due to sickness/accident or whatever, you no longer have an earned income to contribute against.

    Death benefits will be lower on an ISA as well. Although you dont plan to die, 1 in 5 will not make retirement.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • lisyloo
    lisyloo Posts: 29,615 Forumite
    Name Dropper First Anniversary First Post
    Options
    There are some risks as well. If you are unable to work due to sickness/accident or whatever, you no longer have an earned income to contribute against.

    Yes, sounds risky to me.

    I'm not sure how many people retire when they plan to.
    If you are unlucky enough to be made redundant at 55 or above then it's very difficult to get anyone to employ you.

    I personally think it's sensible to do both (pensions and ISAs) and other things as well (like having a big house to downsize from or other property investments).

    There are so many uncertainties that this makes sense to me.
  • EdInvestor
    EdInvestor Posts: 15,749 Forumite
    Options
    I'm not sure how many people retire when they plan to.
    If you are unlucky enough to be made redundant at 55 or above then it's very difficult to get anyone to employ you.

    Indeed so, and this is when you could unexpectedly need money - which you may not be able to get if you've put all your savings in a pension.Particularly in a company pension, where you'll pay a big penalty to retire early.

    Definitely sensible to spread your money around.

    [And you still don't get any compound growth on the tax relief!]
    Trying to keep it simple...;)
  • exil
    exil Posts: 1,194 Forumite
    Options
    Well, it would be a bad thing if you knew you weren't going to live to retirement age and would like to access the money to (a) pass on to relatives or (b) live the life of Reilly in the meantime!

    In historical terms, when people died young in general, pensions were a good deal (if you lived to collect them) as you in effect won a bet at long odds, and annuity rates were high since you weren't expected to live long past retirement. Now the vast majority of people do collect their pension, and live for a decade or more afterwards, a pension scheme has little advantage - other than tax relief - over other investments.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 343.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 250.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 449.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 235.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 608K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 173.1K Life & Family
  • 247.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 15.9K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards