Advocate
27-07-2007, 12:28 PM
Hi all
Me and my partner would really welcome anyone's advice on this, particularly if they are in the medical profession. Apologies if this is a long post, but we'd really appreciate if anyone could take the time to read it all.
My partner and I visited our GP together a few days ago and are really concerned at the treatment we received.
Right from the outset the GP appeared to be in a shirty mood, and before we'd even begun she snapped "You'll have to be quick, I haven't got long". Not a good start, particularly as we had come about two serious issues.
First of all we wanted the results (and the GP's assessment) of a fertility test I had done at the hospital. The GP printed them off her computer then stared at them on her desk for a while. She then said, to our surprise "I don't really know how I'm supposed to interpret these, because I don't know what's classed as normal".
Forgive me, but I thought they learned things like that at medical school? And what about all those books on her shelves - wouldn't they provide clues?
She pointed to one line of the result and said "This says 40 but I don't know what it's out of - 40 is just a number and could mean anything."
I then saw a percentage sign directly after the number 40 (even though I was reading it at a distance, and upside down) and pointed this out to her. She said "Oh yes, I didn't notice that. Well I suppose it means 40 out of 100 then". But even then she couldn't say whether this was good, bad or average.
Who's ever heard of a doctor not noticing a percentage sign after a number?
We continued to ask what the results actually meant, but she was extremely vague and could give no real answer. We kept asking what we should do next (regarding trying to have a baby), but again she was vague and could offer no suggestions.
Only at our instigation did she finally refer to us to a specialist unit at a hospital, but she seemed to know nothing about the relevant services offered by the hospitals in the area, and said she would put the matter in the hands of one of the surgery's clerical staff. We still don't know if it was actually necessary to refer us to specialists, because we still don't know if there's a problem!
To be honest we are flabbergasted that a doctor didn't seem to have the faintest idea how to interpret a list of results supplied by the local hospital. We feel we'd have had more success by obtaining the results directly off the hospital and doing some homework on Google! (even though they won't let you do this).
The second issue was a serious condition my partner has suffered from for a long time, and so far all the treatments prescribed by the GP have failed. My partner raised the problem and the GP said "well, there is one new drug I could prescribe which has been available since the start of this year, but I don't know if it's suitable for you as I haven't had time to read up about it".
The GP then wrote the name of the drug on a piece of paper, together with a website address, and told my partner to go away and do her own research on the drug, then come back and tell the GP if she wanted it.
When we got home and visited the website, we found it was prescribing information issued by a pharma company that manufactures the drug, and the website clearly warned that this information was only for the reference of physicians (ie. doctors), and not patients.
Now, I'm not 100% about this, but I've a strong feeling that in the UK there are strict clinical guidelines which say that patients are not supposed to "choose" their own drugs in this manner. I thought that only doctors were supposed to read prescribing information and then make professional assessments.
We're a bit bewildered and shellshocked by the whole episode. It sounds incredible, I know, but there was nothing professional about this GP's behaviour. It felt like we were taking our medical problems to a bloke in the pub!
Does anyone think we should make a complaint? We're not keen on the idea of doing this, as I suppose it just feels awkward to question someone of that status. But on the other hand, it is a serious matter if a doctor isn't doing their job correctly, and if nobody complains then she will never be held to account.
Me and my partner would really welcome anyone's advice on this, particularly if they are in the medical profession. Apologies if this is a long post, but we'd really appreciate if anyone could take the time to read it all.
My partner and I visited our GP together a few days ago and are really concerned at the treatment we received.
Right from the outset the GP appeared to be in a shirty mood, and before we'd even begun she snapped "You'll have to be quick, I haven't got long". Not a good start, particularly as we had come about two serious issues.
First of all we wanted the results (and the GP's assessment) of a fertility test I had done at the hospital. The GP printed them off her computer then stared at them on her desk for a while. She then said, to our surprise "I don't really know how I'm supposed to interpret these, because I don't know what's classed as normal".
Forgive me, but I thought they learned things like that at medical school? And what about all those books on her shelves - wouldn't they provide clues?
She pointed to one line of the result and said "This says 40 but I don't know what it's out of - 40 is just a number and could mean anything."
I then saw a percentage sign directly after the number 40 (even though I was reading it at a distance, and upside down) and pointed this out to her. She said "Oh yes, I didn't notice that. Well I suppose it means 40 out of 100 then". But even then she couldn't say whether this was good, bad or average.
Who's ever heard of a doctor not noticing a percentage sign after a number?
We continued to ask what the results actually meant, but she was extremely vague and could give no real answer. We kept asking what we should do next (regarding trying to have a baby), but again she was vague and could offer no suggestions.
Only at our instigation did she finally refer to us to a specialist unit at a hospital, but she seemed to know nothing about the relevant services offered by the hospitals in the area, and said she would put the matter in the hands of one of the surgery's clerical staff. We still don't know if it was actually necessary to refer us to specialists, because we still don't know if there's a problem!
To be honest we are flabbergasted that a doctor didn't seem to have the faintest idea how to interpret a list of results supplied by the local hospital. We feel we'd have had more success by obtaining the results directly off the hospital and doing some homework on Google! (even though they won't let you do this).
The second issue was a serious condition my partner has suffered from for a long time, and so far all the treatments prescribed by the GP have failed. My partner raised the problem and the GP said "well, there is one new drug I could prescribe which has been available since the start of this year, but I don't know if it's suitable for you as I haven't had time to read up about it".
The GP then wrote the name of the drug on a piece of paper, together with a website address, and told my partner to go away and do her own research on the drug, then come back and tell the GP if she wanted it.
When we got home and visited the website, we found it was prescribing information issued by a pharma company that manufactures the drug, and the website clearly warned that this information was only for the reference of physicians (ie. doctors), and not patients.
Now, I'm not 100% about this, but I've a strong feeling that in the UK there are strict clinical guidelines which say that patients are not supposed to "choose" their own drugs in this manner. I thought that only doctors were supposed to read prescribing information and then make professional assessments.
We're a bit bewildered and shellshocked by the whole episode. It sounds incredible, I know, but there was nothing professional about this GP's behaviour. It felt like we were taking our medical problems to a bloke in the pub!
Does anyone think we should make a complaint? We're not keen on the idea of doing this, as I suppose it just feels awkward to question someone of that status. But on the other hand, it is a serious matter if a doctor isn't doing their job correctly, and if nobody complains then she will never be held to account.