View Full Version : Pass Emissions for MOT ?
My car has failed on emissions, I've been told by different people exhaust (had that checked - ok), the censor (one said he had looked at that) and if not I'm now advised to get the electrics looked at - engine management, if not could be the cat.
When it failed the reading was quite high, I had an oil and air filter change (haven't done anything else) and (but according to a different garage) the level has only just failed.
Is there anything I can do to get the levels down? Would giving everything a clean under the bonnet help?
I was also told that I should run it before taking the test again - would a trip up the motorway or dual carriageway be enough to bring it up to a pass if I did that just before taking it for the re-test (if it really is that marginal).
MarkyMarkD
22-12-2004, 2:52 AM
Giving it a good hard run may well help. Even better you can get additives which you put in the petrol which will clean things up - add them before you go for the blast up the m/way or dual carriageway.
And watch out for speed limit compliance ;)
Can't remember the name of the additives but somewhere like a motoring accessory shop/garage/Halfords would have it.
Thanks I'll try that. Hope it passes though. ::)
jack_pott
06-01-2005, 2:06 PM
My insurance man's car failed on emissions. The Rover dealer said £500 for a new engine, a local mobile engine tuner fixed it for £50!
How old is your car? & model?
Mine failed last month and is only 3 years old. I payed £40 to get the sensors cleaned and used some cataclean ( i think it was called that) and took it for a good run on the nearest motorway. This solved it.
skiddy2k
07-01-2005, 2:20 PM
do you have a bluish or black coloured exhaust fumes? when you accelerate?
try looking when your car is stationary, stand outside car, put foot on pedal.
scamreporter100
21-02-2009, 1:54 PM
How old is your car? & model?
Mine failed last month and is only 3 years old. I payed £40 to get the sensors cleaned and used some cataclean ( i think it was called that) and took it for a good run on the nearest motorway. This solved it.
:T
CATACLEAN ANOTHER FUEL ADDITIVE SCAM
CataClean
The fuel additive company CataClean makes remarkable claims; they are now trying to break into the American market after ripping of many people in the UK. Investigations by the ASA into Cataclean found the company's (CataClean Global Ltd & System Products (UK) Ltd which is run from a small porter cabin in Liverpool United Kingdom) marketing plan is fraught with false and misleading statements, which the ASA started to investigate after receiving many complaints," read the full report at http://www.asa.org.uk/asa/adjudications/Public/TF_ADJ_41571 The Director Ross Baigent has a history of fuel additive company scams and is linked to a major fuel additive fraud in Australia, Firepower run by his business partner Tim Johnston.
Paparika
21-02-2009, 3:22 PM
Mine failed the emissions too, then again they broke my handbrake and denied it on Thursday... so i don't know if i believe them.
I paid another £50 odd pounds to have the something done that probably would of cost me a £5 to do my self but it passed 2nd time
taxi97w
22-02-2009, 10:24 AM
After the 3 years warranty ran out on my car, I took it to the main dealer for it's MOT. Dealer said it had failed and said it would cost over 200 for a new cat. I was livid and said give me the keys, I'm otta here. After trying to get me to see sense, which I wouldn't, they said they would hook up another car (same model as mine) to the testing apparatus and get it passed, which they did! Didn't cost me owt.
The next year took it to the council testing centre cause I thought the main dealer from last year was trying it on. Council said it had failed, so asked me to take it for a long run and bring it back where they would test it again. Brought it back, it failed, I went all "Oh, no really, it's such a young car, this can't be happening". They also rigged up the apparatus in the end, and passed me.
The year after that, took it in for a small service first and it passed OK. So much for the new cat!!
Didn't do anything to it this year, just to see what would happen this time, it passed completely.
What do I think of all this? Some'll try to scam you, others will try to scam the system to help you.
kaisersoze
22-02-2009, 12:28 PM
Mine failed, so the garage gave me some cleaner to put through the enginge (free of charge) and told me to give it a good run. Took it back an hour later, passed first time and didnt charge me anything extra. Not bad on a 10 year old car.
The Pedant
23-02-2009, 9:04 PM
A new cat does seem somewhat extreme. Last time my car failed on emissions, the garage themselves drove it around the block to pass it. It just needed a little warming up properly (I'm only a mile from the garage). Thankfully they did all this without even bothering me.
Everyone I have known who's failed emissions, has subsequently passed when driven round the block or retested (on the same or sometimes another test rig).
You might want to have a word with friends/colleagues in the area, to see if they have anyone they can recommend for next time.
Paparika
23-02-2009, 11:04 PM
A new cat does seem somewhat extreme. Last time my car failed on emissions, the garage themselves drove it around the block to pass it. It just needed a little warming up properly (I'm only a mile from the garage). Thankfully they did all this without even bothering me.
Everyone I have known who's failed emissions, has subsequently passed when driven round the block or retested (on the same or sometimes another test rig).
You might want to have a word with friends/colleagues in the area, to see if they have anyone they can recommend for next time.
Wish mine had done that for me, although now i know never to take the car to the garage first thing in the morning now, i live right by a motorway so will run it on that first, oh and not to go back the the same garage who did it last week
Pssst
23-02-2009, 11:10 PM
The emissions check should be done when the oil temperature has reached a minimum temperature. MoT testers should insert an oil temp probe into the engine usually via the dipstick hole. Only then should the test be completed. It is unusual for a modern car with an ECU/fuel injection system to fail on emissions. My near 17 year old Golf has never failed on emissions.
I'll move this thread to the 'Motoring & Public Transport' board.
Hi, Martin’s asked me to post this in these circumstances: I’ve asked Board Guides to move threads if they’ll receive a better response elsewhere(please see this rule (http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showthread.html?p=1009335#post1009335)) so this post/thread has been moved to another board, where it should get more replies. If you have any questions about this policy please email abuse@moneysavingexpert.com (abuse@moneysavingexpert.com).
Nile
anewman
04-05-2009, 11:42 AM
The emissions check should be done when the oil temperature has reached a minimum temperature.
I believe they check the coolant hoses are hot and if it passes then it's passed. If it fails then I believe they check the oil temp and perform a slightly different emissions test.
When thrashing a car you don't need to go fast, just use lower gears and rev the engine a bit harder - best to wait till the engines warmed up a bit first before thrashing it though. I would put a double dose of redex in the petrol tank (petrol injection variety if for a petrol injected model). If this doesn't work then you'd be starting to look at the temperature sender (though if this failed there'd usually be noticeable running problems), then the more expensive Lambda sensor, or even the more expensive still catalytic converter.
Cleaning things under the bonnet may well make things look nicer, and stop the car from starting and damage expensive electrical components if done incorrectly, but won't reduce emissions :)
asbokid
05-05-2009, 1:50 AM
things to do if your car fails the emissions part of the MOT test..
new sparkplugs - about £8 for a set of standard quality
new HT leads - about £25
new air filter - about £6
check the ignition timing - a cheap strobe gun costs about £10 to DIY.
new lambda (O2) sensors - these sensors can be bought for £10 in a universal form and then spliced onto the proprietary connectors used in the car
new catalytic converter - around £30 - £50 for most popular cars
reset the car's ECU to clear any memorised engine faults. Typically, when an engine fault occurs, the engine's computer (the ECU) runs the engine in 'limp mode'.
When the engine is running correctly, the ECU normally adjusts the fuel-air mix on a dynamic basis, according to data received in real-time from the engine sensors.
However, when the engine is crippled and running in limp mode, the ECU uses a static table of data for fuel-air mapping. This is inefficient and can cause excessive exhaust emissions.
Obviously it is sensible to remedy any engine fault, but some faults can be transient, or one-offs (e.g. a temporary electrical sensor fault is often triggered by driving through a flood).. However, these faults may still be memorised by the ECU, affecting the overall efficiency and performance of an otherwise healthy engine.
Resetting the ECU could clear these faults, and help your car to pass the MOT emissions test.
things to do if your car fails the emissions part of the MOT test……….
………new catalytic converter - around £30 - £50 for most popular cars
I think you are missing a zero here
asbokid
05-05-2009, 2:06 AM
I think you are missing a zero here
cats for many popular cars are available for under 50 quid..
http://www.cats-direct-shop.co.uk/
i would expect the fitting cost to be under £20 including any new gaskets needed.
thanks for the link, way cheaper than I thought
anewman
05-05-2009, 10:45 AM
Problem is the cheapie cats will have failed come next MOT. Better to buy the OE one if you want it to last. Often similar for the Lambda sensors, but if you look on Ebay Bosch ones can be gotten hold of relatively cheap (compared to Mfr's prices).
Bad HT leads would usually reveal themselves in running problems or obvious sparks when the running engine is viewed in the dark.
Timing is usually handled by the ECU now so a strobe gun is useless. There are usually just marks to line up, and these would only be incorrect if a timing chain had stretched for example.
asbokid
06-05-2009, 4:05 AM
Problem is the cheapie cats will have failed come next MOT.
Funny.. a local motor factors said that to me four years ago... but my £28 cheapo catalytic converter is still going strong.. I've grown fond of that cat! It follows me from car to car!
I actually showed the motor factors my £28 "cheapie cat", and pointed out to them that the quality of the steel it is made from is superior to their own cat for sale at £200+ !! Ahh, they claimed! That's as maybe, but it will still be crap on the inside, they said!
Well, four years on, that's proven not the case.. The factors came back to me later, to ask for the contact details of the place i had gotten the cheapo cats from.... I wonder why........
Better to buy the OE one if you want it to last.You have some unequivocal MTBF data to actually show that? Thought not!
As I'm sure you're aware, that company (Sutton Auto Factors (http://www.autospares-group.co.uk/)) has been selling discount car parts for decades.
As well as discount catalytic converters, they sell all manner of other vehicle components.. brakes, suspension, steering, drivetrain, fuel and ignition components, filters.. you name it, they've got it..
most of their cats come with a two year warranty and the company sells well known brands of all exhaust components, including Timax, Arvin and Belton Massey...
And shipping is an astonishing £7.50 whatever you buy... I feel slightly embarrassed when the delivery man staggers in with an eight foot length of centre pipe, shipped across the country for just £7.50.
I got another story about the ever-friendly local motor factors and his desperate protectionist claims that his online rivals are selling crap and dangerous car parts..
Well, we were getting wishbones (lower suspension arms) from Suttons.. they were branded Quinton Hazell (a well respected make), and cost about £50 each instead of the £190 demanded by the local factors.. The local factors got so desperate, they actually started spinning a tale that the wishbones were fake QH!
Often similar for the Lambda sensors, but if you look on Ebay Bosch ones can be gotten hold of relatively cheap (compared to Mfr's prices).Ahh, that old chestnut!
The cheapo lambda sensors on ebay are made in Poland (snigger) and the Bosch ones costing six times the price are made in.............. the very same factory in.............. Poland!!
No surprise then, that when you lay a £10 sensor next to a "genuine" sensor costing £50 or more, the two sensors are, quite literally, identical..
The car makers are notorious for fitting obscure, and patented electrical connectors to bog-standard lambda sensors.
That is done quite cynically to force customers into buying a "genuine" replacement sensor with the same obscure, patented connector, at great expense, reaping huge profits for the car maker.
Therein is the benefit of splicing a universal lambda sensor onto the existing electrical connector that was removed from the old and faulty sensor.
Timing is usually handled by the ECU now so a strobe gun is uselessSince this is a thread about MOT emission failures, we will be talking largely about older cars. Many of those cars will still be using a distributor-based ignition system.. and as such ignition timing is crucial to the efficient running of the engine. £10 for a strobe gun to check the ignition timing on those vehicles is peanuts compared to paying the labour charges of a garage.
Since there is a common theme to your posts, I sense you've got something of an agenda here, anewman! You evidently don't like people doing DIY car maintenance. You want people to visit the garage, buy high cost "genuine" components, and pay a fortune to have them fitted!
Fee Fi Fo Fum! I smell a wee vested interest in there. I think you are on the wrong forum!
This is "moneysavingexpert.com".. And "moneysuckinggarage.com" is that way! ---------------------->
anewman
06-05-2009, 4:43 AM
Since this is a thread about MOT emission failures, we will be talking largely about older cars. Many of those cars will still be using a distributor-based ignition system.. and as such ignition timing is crucial to the efficient running of the engine.
Even my 1994 Skoda Favorit has ECU controlled ignition timing advance with a Bosch Monomotronic system. All you have to do is turn the engine and line up the marks ensuring that the engine is at TDC with cylinder 1 on compression. The timing itself is not adjustable (either the rotor arm is in the correct position to be able to create the arc to the correct spark plug, or it isn't [both with and without the timing advanced]). A timing light is useless on such a setup. I don't know much about other cars of that age, but I wouldn't have thought a Skoda was more advanced than other cars such as Ford, Vauxhall etc.
I sense you've got something of an agenda here, anewman!
You evidently don't like people doing DIY car maintenance. You want people to visit the garage, buy high cost "genuine" components, and pay a fortune to have them fitted!
Quite the opposite. I'd hate to see anyone buy cheap and buy twice if they have a long-term interest in the car. If they just need a "get me through the MOT I'll get rid of the car in a year or two" then I'm sure the cheapies would be the best option. You can still buy genuine off ebay sometimes at cheaper prices.
asbokid
06-05-2009, 5:26 AM
I don't know much about other cars....... I wouldn't have thought a Skoda was more advanced than other cars such as Ford, Vauxhall etc.
Well, you're wrong there then..
The question of vehicle ignition types is a side issue. However, I will point out, for others who question your motives, that the ubiquitous Nissan Micra (K11) has a distributor-based ignition system....
http://www.honestjohn.co.uk/lib/img_draw.php?image=/home/www/honestjohn.co.uk/html/uploads/carimgs/274_1.jpg&max_width=278
Nissan Micra K11
Literally millions of those cars were sold new, right up until 5 years ago. Many of the Micra K11s with their "jewel like (http://www.honestjohn.co.uk/carbycar/index.htm?md=274)" 16v chain-driven engines are still on the road.
As such, that popular little Nissan model needs to have its ignition timing set with a strobe gun, to ensure efficient engine running. Incorrectly set ignition timing can cause an emission failure in the MOT test.
http://i23.ebayimg.com/01/i/001/1f/8f/dfcb_12.JPG
A Micra K11 distributor (circa 2003).
Note the slider, for adjusting the ignition timing with the use of a strobe gun.
http://www.scooterhelp.com/tips/timing/timing.gun.jpg
Typical ignition timing gun, or "strobe gun" (cost around £10-£15)
I'd hate to see anyone buy cheap and buy twiceYawn.. This is laughable logic loaded with smear and hearsay.
You've offered us no proof that the high cost "genuine" components last any longer than their "cheapie" counterparts. In fact, it is good practice to change lambda sensors on a routine basis, whether they have failed or not. Sensors tend not to function so well as they get older, so it's invariably a false economy to keep old, worn but exceedingly expensive, "genuine" sensors, to try and save money.
Let's take the lambda sensor as the example..
A "genuine" Ford sensor can cost £60 or more. Since this is "moneysavingexpert.com", please show us proof that those "genuine" sensors do last at least six times as long as the £10 equivalent, thereby saving us money.
Furthermore, provide us with proof that the £60 sensor retained for six years, continues to operate to the same efficiency throughout its lifetime as the £10 sensor, replaced routinely once a year....
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.